10-42784548-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_ModerateBS2
The NM_014753.4(BMS1):c.154C>T(p.Arg52Trp) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00028 in 1,612,910 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R52Q) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_014753.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- aplasia cutis congenitaInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: G2P, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_014753.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMS1 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.154C>T | p.Arg52Trp | missense | Exon 2 of 23 | ENSP00000363642.4 | Q14692 | ||
| BMS1 | c.154C>T | p.Arg52Trp | missense | Exon 2 of 24 | ENSP00000547483.1 | ||||
| BMS1 | c.154C>T | p.Arg52Trp | missense | Exon 2 of 23 | ENSP00000636950.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000256 AC: 39AN: 152184Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000108 AC: 27AN: 250198 AF XY: 0.0000739 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000283 AC: 413AN: 1460726Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000278 AC XY: 202AN XY: 726658 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000256 AC: 39AN: 152184Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000229 AC XY: 17AN XY: 74338 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at