10-43109124-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1

The NM_020975.6(RET):​c.1157C>T​(p.Ala386Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000154 in 1,613,872 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00093 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000074 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

RET
NM_020975.6 missense

Scores

1
18

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:7O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.38
Variant links:
Genes affected
RET (HGNC:9967): (ret proto-oncogene) This gene encodes a transmembrane receptor and member of the tyrosine protein kinase family of proteins. Binding of ligands such as GDNF (glial cell-line derived neurotrophic factor) and other related proteins to the encoded receptor stimulates receptor dimerization and activation of downstream signaling pathways that play a role in cell differentiation, growth, migration and survival. The encoded receptor is important in development of the nervous system, and the development of organs and tissues derived from the neural crest. This proto-oncogene can undergo oncogenic activation through both cytogenetic rearrangement and activating point mutations. Mutations in this gene are associated with Hirschsprung disease and central hypoventilation syndrome and have been identified in patients with renal agenesis. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2017]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0088737905).
BP6
Variant 10-43109124-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-43109124-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 135186.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=5, Benign=1, Uncertain_significance=1, not_provided=1}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000926 (141/152294) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00322 (134/41558). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00278. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 68 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
RETNM_020975.6 linkc.1157C>T p.Ala386Val missense_variant Exon 6 of 20 ENST00000355710.8 NP_066124.1 P07949-1A0A024R7T2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
RETENST00000355710.8 linkc.1157C>T p.Ala386Val missense_variant Exon 6 of 20 5 NM_020975.6 ENSP00000347942.3 P07949-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000927
AC:
141
AN:
152176
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00323
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000393
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000219
AC:
55
AN:
250962
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000199
AC XY:
27
AN XY:
135772
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00271
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000318
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000739
AC:
108
AN:
1461578
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0000770
AC XY:
56
AN XY:
727112
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00251
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000246
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000383
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000360
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000116
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000926
AC:
141
AN:
152294
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000913
AC XY:
68
AN XY:
74482
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00322
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000392
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000238
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000990
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00227
AC:
10
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.000296
AC:
36
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:7Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2Other:1
Sep 19, 2013
ITMI
Significance: not provided
Review Status: no classification provided
Collection Method: reference population

- -

Feb 08, 2019
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: The variant, RET c.1157C>T (p.Ala386Val) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00026 in 277152 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0025 within the African subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within African control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 68 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in RET causing Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 2 phenotype (3.7e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of African origin. The variant, c.1157C>T has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Hirschsprung's disease (Carter_2012). However, this report does not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 2. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Three clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation (2X Likely Benign and 1X Uncertain Significance). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -

Nov 28, 2023
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Mar 25, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 31, 2016
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Feb 07, 2019
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Mar 01, 2022
Sema4, Sema4
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: curation

- -

Multiple endocrine neoplasia, type 2 Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

RET-related disorder Benign:1
Jul 13, 2019
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.087
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.43
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.39
CADD
Benign
16
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.41
T;.;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.61
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.62
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.19
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.63
T;T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.061
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0089
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.85
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.0
N;.;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.25
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.69
N;.;N
REVEL
Benign
0.054
Sift
Benign
0.19
T;.;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.28
T;T;T
Polyphen
0.21
B;.;B
Vest4
0.25
MVP
0.64
MPC
0.21
ClinPred
0.020
T
GERP RS
2.5
Varity_R
0.024
gMVP
0.70

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs115272158; hg19: chr10-43604572; COSMIC: COSV60690732; COSMIC: COSV60690732; API