10-43113635-TGAG-TGAGGAG
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 5 ACMG points: 5P and 0B. PM1PM2PM4_Supporting
The NM_020975.6(RET):c.1846_1848dupGAG(p.Glu616dup) variant causes a conservative inframe insertion change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000684 in 1,461,170 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. K617K) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_020975.6 conservative_inframe_insertion
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- familial medullary thyroid carcinomaInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, G2P
- multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2AInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen, G2P
- multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2BInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
- pheochromocytomaInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
- Hirschsprung disease, susceptibility to, 1Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- Haddad syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Hirschsprung diseaseInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- renal agenesis, unilateralInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- bilateral renal agenesisInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- renal agenesisInheritance: AR Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: G2P
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 5 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RET | NM_020975.6 | c.1846_1848dupGAG | p.Glu616dup | conservative_inframe_insertion | Exon 10 of 20 | ENST00000355710.8 | NP_066124.1 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RET | ENST00000355710.8 | c.1846_1848dupGAG | p.Glu616dup | conservative_inframe_insertion | Exon 10 of 20 | 5 | NM_020975.6 | ENSP00000347942.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.84e-7 AC: 1AN: 1461170Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 726814 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Multiple endocrine neoplasia, type 2 Uncertain:1
This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with RET-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 1445581). Experimental studies and prediction algorithms are not available or were not evaluated, and the functional significance of this variant is currently unknown. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. This variant, c.1846_1848dup, results in the insertion of 1 amino acid(s) of the RET protein (p.Glu616dup), but otherwise preserves the integrity of the reading frame.
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1
The c.1846_1848dupGAG variant (also known as p.E616dup), located in coding exon 10 of the RET gene, results from an in-frame duplication of GAG at nucleotide positions 1846 to 1848. This results in the duplication of an extra residue between codons 616 and 617. This region is well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be neutral by in silico analysis (Choi Y et al. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7(10):e46688). Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear.
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at