10-47349998-A-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_002900.3(RBP3):​c.1514A>T​(p.His505Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00043 in 1,612,884 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 8/10 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00027 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00045 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

RBP3
NM_002900.3 missense

Scores

1
6

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.43
Variant links:
Genes affected
RBP3 (HGNC:9921): (retinol binding protein 3) Interphotoreceptor retinol-binding protein is a large glycoprotein known to bind retinoids and found primarily in the interphotoreceptor matrix of the retina between the retinal pigment epithelium and the photoreceptor cells. It is thought to transport retinoids between the retinal pigment epithelium and the photoreceptors, a critical role in the visual process.The human IRBP gene is approximately 9.5 kbp in length and consists of four exons separated by three introns. The introns are 1.6-1.9 kbp long. The gene is transcribed by photoreceptor and retinoblastoma cells into an approximately 4.3-kilobase mRNA that is translated and processed into a glycosylated protein of 135,000 Da. The amino acid sequence of human IRBP can be divided into four contiguous homology domains with 33-38% identity, suggesting a series of gene duplication events. In the gene, the boundaries of these domains are not defined by exon-intron junctions, as might have been expected. The first three homology domains and part of the fourth are all encoded by the first large exon, which is 3,180 base pairs long. The remainder of the fourth domain is encoded in the last three exons, which are 191, 143, and approximately 740 base pairs long, respectively. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.060782492).
BP6
Variant 10-47349998-A-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-47349998-A-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 193241.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=2, Benign=1}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000269 (41/152160) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.00208 (10/4818). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00113. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 24 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 3 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
RBP3NM_002900.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1514A>T p.His505Leu missense_variant 1/4 ENST00000584701.2 NP_002891.1 P10745

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
RBP3ENST00000584701.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.1514A>T p.His505Leu missense_variant 1/41 NM_002900.3 ENSP00000463151.1 P10745

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000270
AC:
41
AN:
152044
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00635
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000103
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000959
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000762
AC:
190
AN:
249314
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000851
AC XY:
115
AN XY:
135118
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00814
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00275
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000169
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000987
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000447
AC:
653
AN:
1460724
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.000541
AC XY:
393
AN XY:
726630
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00809
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00299
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000125
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000662
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000269
AC:
41
AN:
152160
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000323
AC XY:
24
AN XY:
74380
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00635
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00208
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000103
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000949
Alfa
AF:
0.00121
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000227
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00144
AC:
5
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 20, 2024- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Sep 29, 2014- -
Retinitis pigmentosa 66 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedliterature onlyClinVar Staff, National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI)Jun 27, 2013- -
Retinitis pigmentosa Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.096
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.37
CADD
Benign
6.5
DANN
Benign
0.90
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.19
T
LIST_S2
Benign
0.63
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.061
T
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.011
D
Vest4
0.34
gMVP
0.97

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs201808774; hg19: chr10-48389364; API