10-49455420-T-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_Strong BP6_Moderate BS1 BS2

The NM_000124.4(ERCC6):c.*3395A>C variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00753 in 152,306 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 12 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.0075 (12 hom., cov: 33)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.0 (0 hom.)
  • Failed GnomAD Quality Control
• Consequence: ERCC6 NM_000124.4 3_prime_UTR
• Clinical Significance: Benign criteria provided, single submitter B:3
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -0.799

Genes affected

ERCC6 (HGNC:3438): (ERCC excision repair 6, chromatin remodeling factor) This gene encodes a DNA-binding protein that is important in transcription-coupled excision repair. The encoded protein has ATP-stimulated ATPase activity, interacts with several transcription and excision repair proteins, and may promote complex formation at DNA repair sites. Mutations in this gene are associated with Cockayne syndrome type B and cerebrooculofacioskeletal syndrome 1. Alternative splicing occurs between a splice site from exon 5 of this gene to the 3' splice site upstream of the open reading frame (ORF) of the adjacent gene, piggyback-derived-3 (GeneID:267004), which activates the alternative polyadenylation site downstream of the piggyback-derived-3 ORF. The resulting transcripts encode a fusion protein that shares sequence with the product of each individual gene. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2016]

(HGNC:):

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.89).
• BP6: Variant 10-49455420-T-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-49455420-T-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 879446.Status of the report is criteria_provided_single_submitter, 1 stars.
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00753 (1147/152306) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0253 (1050/41558). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.024. There are 12 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 553 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
• BS2: High Homozygotes in GnomAd at 12 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
ERCC6	NM_000124.4	c.*3395A>C		3_prime_UTR_variant	21/21	ENST00000355832.10
ERCC6	NM_001346440.2	c.*3395A>C		3_prime_UTR_variant	21/21

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
ERCC6	ENST00000355832.10	c.*3395A>C		3_prime_UTR_variant	21/21	1	NM_000124.4	P1
	ENST00000423283.1	n.235-17283T>G		intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant		3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00752 AC: 1145 AN: 152188 Hom.: 12 Cov.: 33

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.0253

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00484

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00316

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.000103

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00718

GnomAD4 exome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0 AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 2 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0 AN XY: 2

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.00

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00753 AC: 1147 AN: 152306 Hom.: 12 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00742 AC XY: 553 AN XY: 74482

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.0253

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.00483

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.000103

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00710

Alfa AF: 0.00630 Hom.: 1

Bravo AF: 0.00850

Asia WGS AF: 0.00144 AC: 5 AN: 3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:3

Revision: criteria provided, single submitter

Submissions by phenotype

Age related macular degeneration 5 Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Cerebrooculofacioskeletal syndrome 1 Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Cockayne syndrome type 2 Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.89
Cadd	Benign	0.55
Dann	Benign	0.62

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs142122327; hg19: chr10-50663466;