10-49620580-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBS1_Supporting
The NM_020549.5(CHAT):āc.665G>Cā(p.Arg222Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00124 in 1,613,606 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_020549.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHAT | NM_020549.5 | c.665G>C | p.Arg222Pro | missense_variant | 4/15 | ENST00000337653.7 | NP_065574.4 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHAT | ENST00000337653.7 | c.665G>C | p.Arg222Pro | missense_variant | 4/15 | 1 | NM_020549.5 | ENSP00000337103 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00134 AC: 204AN: 152112Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000811 AC: 204AN: 251436Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000817 AC XY: 111AN XY: 135892
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00123 AC: 1798AN: 1461376Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00124 AC XY: 900AN XY: 726998
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00133 AC: 203AN: 152230Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00159 AC XY: 118AN XY: 74442
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Familial infantile myasthenia Uncertain:2Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Revvity Omics, Revvity | Dec 20, 2023 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Baylor Genetics | Nov 12, 2018 | This variant was determined to be of uncertain significance according to ACMG Guidelines, 2015 [PMID:25741868]. - |
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 22, 2017 | The R222P variant has not been published as a pathogenic variant, nor has it been reported as a benign variant to our knowledge. It was not observed with any significant frequency in approximately 6,500 individuals of European and African American ancestry in the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project, nor was it observed with any significant frequency in the 1000 Genomes Project. The R222P variant is a non-conservative amino acid substitution, which is likely to impact secondary protein structure as these residues differ in polarity, charge, size and/or other properties. However, this substitution occurs at a position that is not conserved, and missense variants in nearby residues have not been reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database in association with CHAT-related disorders (Stenson et al., 2014). In silico analysis is inconsistent in its predictions as to whether or not the variant is damaging to the protein structure/function. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Feb 16, 2018 | - - |
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Jun 10, 2016 | - - |
Inborn genetic diseases Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Sep 17, 2021 | The c.665G>C (p.R222P) alteration is located in exon 4 (coding exon 4) of the CHAT gene. This alteration results from a G to C substitution at nucleotide position 665, causing the arginine (R) at amino acid position 222 to be replaced by a proline (P). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at