10-54079437-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 2P and 6B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6_Moderate
The NM_033056.4(PCDH15):c.1998-13G>A variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_033056.4 intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 23Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
- Usher syndrome type 1Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
- Usher syndrome type 1FInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
- hearing loss, autosomal recessiveInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- nonsyndromic genetic hearing lossInheritance: AR Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCDH15 | ENST00000320301.11 | c.1998-13G>A | intron_variant | Intron 16 of 32 | 1 | NM_033056.4 | ENSP00000322604.6 | |||
PCDH15 | ENST00000644397.2 | c.1998-13G>A | intron_variant | Intron 16 of 37 | NM_001384140.1 | ENSP00000495195.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 29
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:1
1998-13G>A in Intron 17 of PCDH15: This variant is not expected to have clinica l significance because it is not located in the invariant (-1/-2) splice site po sitions and computational tools do not suggest an impact to splicing. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at