10-54346413-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_033056.4(PCDH15):c.546A>G(p.Gly182Gly) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0191 in 1,613,494 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 337 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. G182G) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_033056.4 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 23Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
- Usher syndrome type 1Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
- Usher syndrome type 1FInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
- hearing loss, autosomal recessiveInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- nonsyndromic genetic hearing lossInheritance: AR Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCDH15 | ENST00000320301.11 | c.546A>G | p.Gly182Gly | synonymous_variant | Exon 6 of 33 | 1 | NM_033056.4 | ENSP00000322604.6 | ||
| PCDH15 | ENST00000644397.2 | c.546A>G | p.Gly182Gly | synonymous_variant | Exon 6 of 38 | NM_001384140.1 | ENSP00000495195.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0148 AC: 2259AN: 152194Hom.: 21 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0138 AC: 3480AN: 251318 AF XY: 0.0136 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0195 AC: 28506AN: 1461182Hom.: 316 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0190 AC XY: 13780AN XY: 726914 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0148 AC: 2259AN: 152312Hom.: 21 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0139 AC XY: 1038AN XY: 74472 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
- -
This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not a lter an amino acid residue, is not located near a splice junction and is listed in dbSNP(rs34164469 - 2 submissions). In addition, this variant has been identif ied by our laboratory in an individual who has a homozygous pathogenic variant i n another gene that the causes hearing loss. -
- -
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Usher syndrome type 1F Benign:3
- -
- -
- -
not provided Benign:3
- -
- -
- -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 23 Benign:1
- -
Usher syndrome type 1 Benign:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at