10-62813729-T-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points: 2P and 17B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1
The NM_000399.5(EGR2):c.909A>C(p.Ala303Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000297 in 1,606,888 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000399.5 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000941 AC: 143AN: 152040Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000512 AC: 121AN: 236258Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000478 AC XY: 62AN XY: 129726
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000227 AC: 330AN: 1454730Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000228 AC XY: 165AN XY: 723340
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000973 AC: 148AN: 152158Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00118 AC XY: 88AN XY: 74394
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
EGR2: BP4, BP7 -
- -
not specified Benign:1
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, type I Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at