10-62815851-C-A

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The ENST00000439032.6(EGR2):n.179G>T variant causes a non coding transcript exon change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00159 in 1,613,904 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 38 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0086 ( 15 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00085 ( 23 hom. )

Consequence

EGR2
ENST00000439032.6 non_coding_transcript_exon

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.487

Publications

1 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

EGR2 (HGNC:3239): (early growth response 2) The protein encoded by this gene is a transcription factor with three tandem C2H2-type zinc fingers. Defects in this gene are associated with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1D (CMT1D), Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4E (CMT4E), and with Dejerine-Sottas syndrome (DSS). Multiple transcript variants encoding two different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]

EGR2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4E
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease
Inheritance: SD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1D
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 3
Inheritance: SD, AD Classification: MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Orphanet

EGR2 links:

ENSG00000289487 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000289487 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.65).

BP6

Variant 10-62815851-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-62815851-C-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 300280.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00864 (1316/152316) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0301 (1251/41562). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0287. There are 15 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 628 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 15 AD,AR,SD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
EGR2	NM_000399.5 link	c.169+10G>T		intron_variant	Intron 1 of 1	ENST00000242480.4	NP_000390.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
EGR2	ENST00000242480.4 link	c.169+10G>T		intron_variant	Intron 1 of 1	1	NM_000399.5	ENSP00000242480.3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00862

AC:

1312

AN:

152198

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0301

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00308

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00633

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00622

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00224

AC:

558

AN:

249404

AF XY:

0.00165

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0304

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00145

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000447

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00131

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000852

AC:

1246

AN:

1461588

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000714

AC XY:

519

AN XY:

727078

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0313

AC:

1047

AN:

33474

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00157

AC:

AN:

44720

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26134

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000812

AC:

AN:

86252

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53380

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000349

AC:

AN:

5734

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000135

AC:

AN:

1111832

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00174

AC:

105

AN:

60362

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.481

Heterozygous variant carriers

144

215

287

359

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

112

140

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00864

AC:

1316

AN:

152316

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00843

AC XY:

628

AN XY:

74490

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0301

AC:

1251

AN:

41562

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00307

AC:

AN:

15304

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3466

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5184

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4830

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10624

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00680

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000441

AC:

AN:

68028

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00616

AC:

AN:

2112

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.497

Heterozygous variant carriers

126

189

252

315

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00465

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0103

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00202

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:3

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:1

Jul 08, 2016

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1D

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, type I

Benign:1

Jan 31, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.65

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.89

PhyloP100

0.49

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over