10-68195498-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP6BS1BS2
The NM_032578.4(MYPN):c.3124C>T(p.Arg1042Cys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000401 in 1,614,034 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00037 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00040 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
MYPN
NM_032578.4 missense
NM_032578.4 missense
Scores
7
8
4
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 5.47
Genes affected
MYPN (HGNC:23246): (myopalladin) Striated muscle in vertebrates comprises large proteins which must be organized properly to contract efficiently. Z-lines in striated muscle are a sign of this organization, representing the ends of actin thin filaments, titin, nebulin or nebulette and accessory proteins required for structure and function. This gene encodes a protein which interacts with nebulin in skeletal muscle or nebulette in cardiac muscle and alpha-actinin. In addition, this gene product can interact with a protein with the I-band indicating it has a regulatory as well as structural function. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2011]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
BP6
Variant 10-68195498-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-68195498-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 155824.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=5}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000374 (57/152258) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.00083 (4/4822). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000534. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 29 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 57 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYPN | NM_032578.4 | c.3124C>T | p.Arg1042Cys | missense_variant | 15/20 | ENST00000358913.10 | NP_115967.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYPN | ENST00000358913.10 | c.3124C>T | p.Arg1042Cys | missense_variant | 15/20 | 1 | NM_032578.4 | ENSP00000351790.5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000375 AC: 57AN: 152140Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
57
AN:
152140
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000414 AC: 104AN: 251424Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000427 AC XY: 58AN XY: 135880
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
104
AN:
251424
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
58
AN XY:
135880
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000404 AC: 590AN: 1461776Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000433 AC XY: 315AN XY: 727202
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
590
AN:
1461776
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
315
AN XY:
727202
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000374 AC: 57AN: 152258Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000390 AC XY: 29AN XY: 74454
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
57
AN:
152258
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
29
AN XY:
74454
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
2
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
1
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
2
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
AC:
48
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:9Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:5
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 29, 2024 | In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Identified in patients with cardiomyopathy in published literature; several patients harbored additional cardiogenetic variants (PMID: 28798025, 26084686, 35284542, 30847666); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 26084686, 35284542, 30847666, 28798025) - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jul 01, 2023 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Apr 11, 2024 | BS1 - |
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1KK Uncertain:3Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | May 31, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 18, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | Aug 22, 2016 | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Primary familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Blueprint Genetics | Oct 15, 2014 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jan 04, 2022 | Variant summary: MYPN c.3124C>T (p.Arg1042Cys) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00041 in 251424 control chromosomes (gnomAD). The observed variant frequency is approximately 8-fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in MYPN causing Cardiomyopathy phenotype (5e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. c.3124C>T has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Cardiomyopathy, including dilated cardiomyopathy, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and left ventricular hypertrabeculation (Akinrinade_2015, Miszalski-Jamka_2017, van Lint_2019). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Cardiomyopathy. A co-occurrence with a pathogenic variant has been reported (TTNI3 c.407G>A, p.Arg136Gln; van Lint_2019). To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Six ClinVar submitters have assessed this variant since 2014: one classified the variant as likely benign and five as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Feb 09, 2021 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
T
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
CADD
Pathogenic
DANN
Pathogenic
DEOGEN2
Benign
.;.;.;T
Eigen
Uncertain
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D;D;.;D
M_CAP
Benign
D
MetaRNN
Uncertain
D;D;D;D
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
M;.;M;.
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
D;D;D;.
REVEL
Uncertain
Sift
Pathogenic
D;D;D;.
Sift4G
Pathogenic
D;D;D;D
Polyphen
D;D;D;.
Vest4
MVP
MPC
0.72
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at