10-70435820-G-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_018055.5(NODAL):c.357C>T(p.Pro119=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000843 in 1,614,104 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 11 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00062 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00087 ( 11 hom. )
Consequence
NODAL
NM_018055.5 synonymous
NM_018055.5 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -2.01
Genes affected
NODAL (HGNC:7865): (nodal growth differentiation factor) This gene encodes a secreted ligand of the TGF-beta (transforming growth factor-beta) superfamily of proteins. Ligands of this family bind various TGF-beta receptors leading to recruitment and activation of SMAD family transcription factors that regulate gene expression. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate the mature protein, which regulates early embryonic development. This protein is required for maintenance of human embryonic stem cell pluripotency and may play a role in human placental development. Mutations in this gene are associated with heterotaxy, a condition characterized by random orientation of visceral organs with respect to the left-right axis. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.85).
BP6
Variant 10-70435820-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-70435820-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 300305.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-2.01 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000624 (95/152320) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.00643 (31/4824). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00465. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 51 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 95 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NODAL | NM_018055.5 | c.357C>T | p.Pro119= | synonymous_variant | 2/3 | ENST00000287139.8 | |
NODAL | NM_001329906.2 | c.-43C>T | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 2/3 | |||
NODAL | XM_024448028.2 | c.-43C>T | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 2/3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NODAL | ENST00000287139.8 | c.357C>T | p.Pro119= | synonymous_variant | 2/3 | 1 | NM_018055.5 | P1 | |
NODAL | ENST00000414871.1 | c.192C>T | p.Pro64= | synonymous_variant | 2/3 | 1 | |||
ENST00000624563.1 | n.992G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 1/1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000618 AC: 94AN: 152202Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
94
AN:
152202
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00111 AC: 278AN: 250830Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.00151 AC XY: 205AN XY: 135772
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
278
AN:
250830
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
205
AN XY:
135772
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000865 AC: 1265AN: 1461784Hom.: 11 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00109 AC XY: 791AN XY: 727190
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1265
AN:
1461784
Hom.:
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
AC XY:
791
AN XY:
727190
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000624 AC: 95AN: 152320Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000685 AC XY: 51AN XY: 74486
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
95
AN:
152320
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
51
AN XY:
74486
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
6
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Heterotaxy, visceral, 5, autosomal Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Apr 23, 2023 | - - |
Holoprosencephaly sequence Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at