10-70600500-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points: 3P and 20B. PM1PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_001083116.3(PRF1):c.403G>A(p.Val135Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000525 in 1,614,186 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. V135L) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001083116.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001083116.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRF1 | TSL:5 MANE Select | c.403G>A | p.Val135Met | missense | Exon 2 of 3 | ENSP00000398568.1 | P14222 | ||
| PRF1 | TSL:1 | c.403G>A | p.Val135Met | missense | Exon 2 of 3 | ENSP00000362305.1 | P14222 | ||
| PRF1 | c.403G>A | p.Val135Met | missense | Exon 1 of 2 | ENSP00000533032.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00279 AC: 425AN: 152190Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000832 AC: 209AN: 251348 AF XY: 0.000611 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000289 AC: 422AN: 1461878Hom.: 2 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.000256 AC XY: 186AN XY: 727242 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00280 AC: 426AN: 152308Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00277 AC XY: 206AN XY: 74468 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at