10-70884002-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. The variant received 8 ACMG points: 8P and 0B. PM1PM2PP3_Strong
The NM_000281.4(PCBD1):c.263G>C(p.Arg88Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000929 in 1,613,980 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R88W) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000281.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- nephrotic syndrome 14Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_pathogenic. The variant received 8 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCBD1 | NM_000281.4 | c.263G>C | p.Arg88Pro | missense_variant | Exon 4 of 4 | ENST00000299299.4 | NP_000272.1 | |
| PCBD1 | NM_001289797.2 | c.116G>C | p.Arg39Pro | missense_variant | Exon 4 of 4 | NP_001276726.1 | ||
| PCBD1 | NM_001323004.2 | c.216+1150G>C | intron_variant | Intron 3 of 3 | NP_001309933.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152154Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251258 AF XY: 0.00 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000958 AC: 14AN: 1461826Hom.: 0 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.00000688 AC XY: 5AN XY: 727206 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152154Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74328 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at