10-71706901-G-A

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -18 ACMG points: 0P and 18B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_022124.6(CDH23):c.2958G>A(p.Leu986Leu) variant causes a synonymous change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00294 in 1,599,258 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 127 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.016 ( 72 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0016 ( 55 hom. )

Consequence

CDH23
NM_022124.6 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.88

Publications

3 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

CDH23 (HGNC:13733): (cadherin related 23) This gene is a member of the cadherin superfamily, whose genes encode calcium dependent cell-cell adhesion glycoproteins. The encoded protein is thought to be involved in stereocilia organization and hair bundle formation. The gene is located in a region containing the human deafness loci DFNB12 and USH1D. Usher syndrome 1D and nonsyndromic autosomal recessive deafness DFNB12 are caused by allelic mutations of this cadherin-like gene. Upregulation of this gene may also be associated with breast cancer. Alternative splice variants encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, May 2013]

CDH23 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 12
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, PanelApp Australia
nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
Usher syndrome type 1
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
Usher syndrome type 1D
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
hearing loss, autosomal recessive
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

CDH23 links:

ENSG00000300551 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000300551 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -18 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.36).

BP6

Variant 10-71706901-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-71706901-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 45906.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BA1

GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0543 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CDH23	NM_022124.6 link	c.2958G>A	p.Leu986Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 26 of 70	ENST00000224721.12	NP_071407.4	Q9H251-1Q6P152
CDH23	NM_001171930.2 link	c.2958G>A	p.Leu986Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 26 of 32		NP_001165401.1	Q9H251A0A087WYR8Q6P152
CDH23	NM_001171931.2 link	c.2958G>A	p.Leu986Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 26 of 26		NP_001165402.1	Q9H251Q8N5B3

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CDH23	ENST00000224721.12 link	c.2958G>A	p.Leu986Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 26 of 70	5	NM_022124.6	ENSP00000224721.9		Q9H251-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0161

AC:

2455

AN:

152238

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0562

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00602

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000176

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.0110

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00372

AC:

834

AN:

224112

AF XY:

0.00301

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0567

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00271

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000149

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00232

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00155

AC:

2247

AN:

1446902

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00133

AC XY:

956

AN XY:

718236

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0543

AC:

1800

AN:

33138

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00307

AC:

131

AN:

42728

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

25744

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

38886

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000156

AC:

AN:

83458

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

51864

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00192

AC:

AN:

5738

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000841

AC:

AN:

1105480

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00332

AC:

199

AN:

59866

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.482

Heterozygous variant carriers

127

254

382

509

636

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

120

180

240

300

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0162

AC:

2461

AN:

152356

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0150

AC XY:

1116

AN XY:

74508

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0562

AC:

2334

AN:

41564

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00601

AC:

AN:

15308

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5190

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4834

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10630

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000176

AC:

AN:

68036

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0109

AC:

AN:

2116

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.498

Heterozygous variant carriers

118

235

353

470

588

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

120

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00938

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0188

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00260

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:9

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:4

Jan 23, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 22, 2023

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

- -

Nov 12, 2018

Athena Diagnostics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:2

Nov 05, 2013

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Leu986Leu in Exon 26A of CDH23: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located withi n the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 5.0% (210/4234) of A frican American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencin g Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs74702249). -

Jul 07, 2015

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Usher syndrome type 1D

Benign:1

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -

Usher syndrome type 1

Benign:1

Sep 16, 2020

Natera, Inc.

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 12

Benign:1

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.36

CADD

Benign

7.0

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.87

PhyloP100

5.9

Mutation Taster

=96/4

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.030

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over