10-71732072-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_022124.6(CDH23):​c.3801C>T​(p.Thr1267Thr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00219 in 1,613,984 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0019 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0022 ( 5 hom. )

Consequence

CDH23
NM_022124.6 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: -3.93
Variant links:
Genes affected
CDH23 (HGNC:13733): (cadherin related 23) This gene is a member of the cadherin superfamily, whose genes encode calcium dependent cell-cell adhesion glycoproteins. The encoded protein is thought to be involved in stereocilia organization and hair bundle formation. The gene is located in a region containing the human deafness loci DFNB12 and USH1D. Usher syndrome 1D and nonsyndromic autosomal recessive deafness DFNB12 are caused by allelic mutations of this cadherin-like gene. Upregulation of this gene may also be associated with breast cancer. Alternative splice variants encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, May 2013]
C10orf105 (HGNC:20304): (chromosome 10 open reading frame 105) Predicted to be integral component of membrane. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.84).
BP6
Variant 10-71732072-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-71732072-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 45930.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Benign=2, Uncertain_significance=3}. Variant chr10-71732072-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr10-71732072-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-3.93 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00185 (282/152286) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00297 (202/68010). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00263. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 112 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 5 AD,AR,Digenic gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
CDH23NM_022124.6 linkc.3801C>T p.Thr1267Thr synonymous_variant Exon 32 of 70 ENST00000224721.12 NP_071407.4 Q9H251-1Q6P152
CDH23NM_001171930.2 linkc.3801C>T p.Thr1267Thr synonymous_variant Exon 32 of 32 NP_001165401.1 Q9H251A0A087WYR8Q6P152
C10orf105NM_001168390.2 linkc.-6+5656G>A intron_variant Intron 1 of 1 NP_001161862.1 Q8TEF2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CDH23ENST00000224721.12 linkc.3801C>T p.Thr1267Thr synonymous_variant Exon 32 of 70 5 NM_022124.6 ENSP00000224721.9 Q9H251-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00187
AC:
284
AN:
152168
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000483
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0186
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00249
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000576
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00633
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00297
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00144
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00144
AC:
359
AN:
249244
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.00154
AC XY:
208
AN XY:
135218
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000258
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00113
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000497
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000139
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00262
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00198
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00223
AC:
3256
AN:
1461698
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00216
AC XY:
1568
AN XY:
727130
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000418
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00143
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.000497
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000232
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000300
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00274
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00164
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00185
AC:
282
AN:
152286
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00150
AC XY:
112
AN XY:
74462
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000481
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00248
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.000576
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00297
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00142
Alfa
AF:
0.00212
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00199
EpiCase
AF:
0.00311
EpiControl
AF:
0.00296

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 03, 2014
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Thr1267Thr in Exon 32A of CDH23: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located with in the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 0.3% (25/8476) of E uropean American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequenci ng Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs56107171), and in 1.2% (3/ 255) of hispanic chromosomes (CLM, IBS, PUR) by the 1000 Genomes Project. -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 27, 2013
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:2
Oct 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

CDH23: BP4, BP7 -

Jan 14, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 26, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Usher syndrome type 1D Uncertain:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 12 Uncertain:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Usher syndrome type 1 Benign:1
Dec 29, 2019
Natera, Inc.
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.84
CADD
Benign
0.25
DANN
Benign
0.90

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs56107171; hg19: chr10-73491829; COSMIC: COSV99823591; API