10-71738564-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate
The NM_022124.6(CDH23):c.4276G>T(p.Val1426Phe) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000991 in 1,613,826 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. V1426I) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_022124.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 12Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, PanelApp Australia
- nonsyndromic genetic hearing lossInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- Usher syndrome type 1Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
- Usher syndrome type 1DInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
- hearing loss, autosomal recessiveInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152248Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000103 AC: 15AN: 1461578Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000825 AC XY: 6AN XY: 727058 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152248Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74384 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at