10-71740842-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_022124.6(CDH23):​c.4509C>T​(p.Gly1503Gly) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0192 in 1,613,720 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2,099 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.041 ( 340 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.017 ( 1759 hom. )

Consequence

CDH23
NM_022124.6 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.504

Publications

8 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
CDH23 (HGNC:13733): (cadherin related 23) This gene is a member of the cadherin superfamily, whose genes encode calcium dependent cell-cell adhesion glycoproteins. The encoded protein is thought to be involved in stereocilia organization and hair bundle formation. The gene is located in a region containing the human deafness loci DFNB12 and USH1D. Usher syndrome 1D and nonsyndromic autosomal recessive deafness DFNB12 are caused by allelic mutations of this cadherin-like gene. Upregulation of this gene may also be associated with breast cancer. Alternative splice variants encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, May 2013]
CDH23 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 12
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, PanelApp Australia
  • nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • Usher syndrome type 1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
  • Usher syndrome type 1D
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
  • hearing loss, autosomal recessive
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.29).
BP6
Variant 10-71740842-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-71740842-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 45949.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.504 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.182 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
CDH23NM_022124.6 linkc.4509C>T p.Gly1503Gly synonymous_variant Exon 37 of 70 ENST00000224721.12 NP_071407.4 Q9H251-1Q6P152

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CDH23ENST00000224721.12 linkc.4509C>T p.Gly1503Gly synonymous_variant Exon 37 of 70 5 NM_022124.6 ENSP00000224721.9 Q9H251-1
CDH23ENST00000398792.3 linkn.1198C>T non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 8 of 9 2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0409
AC:
6229
AN:
152188
Hom.:
339
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0727
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.110
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0124
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.192
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0221
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0119
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0253
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00254
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0402
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0487
AC:
12127
AN:
248956
AF XY:
0.0406
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0733
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.176
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0178
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.181
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0105
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00308
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0373
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0169
AC:
24731
AN:
1461414
Hom.:
1759
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0162
AC XY:
11793
AN XY:
727016
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0731
AC:
2449
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.169
AC:
7563
AN:
44718
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0169
AC:
441
AN:
26134
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.202
AC:
8019
AN:
39692
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0248
AC:
2138
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0112
AC:
594
AN:
53148
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0295
AC:
170
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00160
AC:
1783
AN:
1111846
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0261
AC:
1574
AN:
60370
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.481
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1130
2259
3389
4518
5648
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
350
700
1050
1400
1750
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0410
AC:
6243
AN:
152306
Hom.:
340
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0432
AC XY:
3217
AN XY:
74474
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0726
AC:
3016
AN:
41554
American (AMR)
AF:
0.110
AC:
1691
AN:
15312
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0124
AC:
43
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.192
AC:
991
AN:
5166
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0222
AC:
107
AN:
4830
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0119
AC:
126
AN:
10618
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0272
AC:
8
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00254
AC:
173
AN:
68034
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0416
AC:
88
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.504
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
294
589
883
1178
1472
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
66
132
198
264
330
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0192
Hom.:
684
Bravo
AF:
0.0530
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0870
AC:
304
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00442
EpiControl
AF:
0.00433

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2
Jun 12, 2009
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 05, 2013
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

not provided Benign:2
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Usher syndrome type 1D Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Usher syndrome type 1 Benign:1
Sep 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 12 Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.29
CADD
Benign
7.8
DANN
Benign
0.82
PhyloP100
0.50
Mutation Taster
=99/1
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs10999978; hg19: chr10-73500599; COSMIC: COSV56467671; COSMIC: COSV56467671; API