10-87864583-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BS3BS1
This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: PTEN c.79+35C>T (IVS1+35C>T) meets criteria to be classified as benign for PTEN Hamartoma Tumor syndrome in an autosomal dominant manner using modified ACMG criteria (Mester et al. 2018; manuscript in preparation). Please see a summary of the rules and criteria codes in the “PTEN ACMG Specifications Summary” document (assertion method column).BS1: Allele frequency of 0.00178 (1.78%, 492/277,200 alleles) in the gnomAD cohort. (PMID 27535533) BS3: Intronic variant with RNA, mini-gene, or other splicing assay demonstrating no splicing impact. (PMID 17636424) LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA000576/MONDO:0017623/003
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000314.8 intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Cowden syndrome 1Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
- PTEN hamartoma tumor syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- macrocephaly-autism syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp, Orphanet
- renal cell carcinomaInheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- leiomyosarcomaInheritance: AR Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- activated PI3K-delta syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Bannayan-Riley-Ruvalcaba syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Cowden diseaseInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Lhermitte-Duclos diseaseInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Proteus-like syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- glioma susceptibility 2Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PTEN | NM_000314.8 | c.79+35C>T | intron_variant | Intron 1 of 8 | ENST00000371953.8 | NP_000305.3 | ||
| PTEN | NM_001304717.5 | c.598+35C>T | intron_variant | Intron 2 of 9 | NP_001291646.4 | |||
| PTEN | NM_001304718.2 | c.-627+35C>T | intron_variant | Intron 1 of 8 | NP_001291647.1 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PTEN | ENST00000371953.8 | c.79+35C>T | intron_variant | Intron 1 of 8 | 1 | NM_000314.8 | ENSP00000361021.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00136 AC: 207AN: 152240Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00193 AC: 486AN: 251392 AF XY: 0.00215 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00224 AC: 3228AN: 1441812Hom.: 11 Cov.: 27 AF XY: 0.00224 AC XY: 1613AN XY: 718614 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00136 AC: 207AN: 152358Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00140 AC XY: 104AN XY: 74508 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome Benign:2
PTEN c.79+35C>T (IVS1+35C>T) meets criteria to be classified as benign for PTEN Hamartoma Tumor syndrome in an autosomal dominant manner using modified ACMG criteria (Mester et al. 2018; manuscript in preparation). Please see a summary of the rules and criteria codes in the 'PTEN ACMG Specifications Summary' document (assertion method column). BS1: Allele frequency of 0.00178 (1.78%, 492/277,200 alleles) in the gnomAD cohort. (PMID 27535533) BS3: Intronic variant with RNA, mini-gene, or other splicing assay demonstrating no splicing impact. (PMID 17636424)
not provided Benign:2
PTEN: BS1
not specified Benign:1
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at