10-87965326-A-G

Position:

chr10-87965326-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points: 3P and 0B. PM2PP2

The NM_000314.8(PTEN):c.1066A>G(p.Asn356Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000206 in 1,457,860 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: not found (cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000021 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

PTEN
NM_000314.8 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:8B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 8.90

Variant links:

Genes affected

PTEN (HGNC:9588): (phosphatase and tensin homolog) This gene was identified as a tumor suppressor that is mutated in a large number of cancers at high frequency. The protein encoded by this gene is a phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-trisphosphate 3-phosphatase. It contains a tensin like domain as well as a catalytic domain similar to that of the dual specificity protein tyrosine phosphatases. Unlike most of the protein tyrosine phosphatases, this protein preferentially dephosphorylates phosphoinositide substrates. It negatively regulates intracellular levels of phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-trisphosphate in cells and functions as a tumor suppressor by negatively regulating AKT/PKB signaling pathway. The use of a non-canonical (CUG) upstream initiation site produces a longer isoform that initiates translation with a leucine, and is thought to be preferentially associated with the mitochondrial inner membrane. This longer isoform may help regulate energy metabolism in the mitochondria. A pseudogene of this gene is found on chromosome 9. Alternative splicing and the use of multiple translation start codons results in multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2015]

PTEN links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

PP2

Missense variant in gene, where missense usually causes diseases (based on misZ statistic), PTEN. . Gene score misZ: 3.4883 (greater than the threshold 3.09). Trascript score misZ: 4.1129 (greater than threshold 3.09). The gene has 209 curated pathogenic missense variants (we use a threshold of 10). The gene has 22 curated benign missense variants. GenCC has associacion of the gene with Lhermitte-Duclos disease, Bannayan-Riley-Ruvalcaba syndrome, Proteus syndrome, macrocephaly-autism syndrome, Cowden syndrome 1, Cowden disease, Proteus-like syndrome, leiomyosarcoma, activated PI3K-delta syndrome, PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome, glioma susceptibility 2, renal cell carcinoma.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
PTEN	NM_000314.8 link	c.1066A>G	p.Asn356Asp	missense_variant	9/9	ENST00000371953.8	NP_000305.3
PTEN	NM_001304717.5 link	c.1585A>G	p.Asn529Asp	missense_variant	10/10		NP_001291646.4	P60484
PTEN	NM_001304718.2 link	c.475A>G	p.Asn159Asp	missense_variant	9/9		NP_001291647.1	P60484

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
PTEN	ENST00000371953.8 link	c.1066A>G	p.Asn356Asp	missense_variant	9/9	1	NM_000314.8	ENSP00000361021.3		P60484-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

Cov.:

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00000408

AC:

AN:

245272

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00

AC XY:

AN XY:

132538

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000907

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00000206

AC:

AN:

1457860

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00000138

AC XY:

AN XY:

724864

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000252

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00000180

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 genome

Cov.:

ExAC

AF:

0.00000824

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:8Benign:1

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Uncertain:2Benign:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health	Apr 05, 2019	- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Ambry Genetics	Oct 09, 2024	The p.N356D variant (also known as c.1066A>G), located in coding exon 9 of the PTEN gene, results from an A to G substitution at nucleotide position 1066. The asparagine at codon 356 is replaced by aspartic acid, an amino acid with highly similar properties. In a massively parallel functional assay using a humanized yeast model, lipid phosphatase activity for this variant was wild type-like (Mighell TL et al. Am J Hum Genet, 2018 May;102:943-955). Based on internal structural analysis, this alteration is in a solvent exposed, unstructured portion of the protein, is associated with low free energy change, and is not known to be involved in any interactions; therefore, the change from asparagine to aspartic acid (a change from neutral to negative) is not expected to have a significant functional effect (Dosztányi Z et al. J. Mol. Biol., 2005 Apr;347:827-39; Li G et al. Cancer Cell, 2014 Apr;25:455-68). This alteration has been reported as a pathogenic mutation in multiple publications from the same research group (Mester JL et al. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2011 Jul;19(7):763-8; Ngeow J et al. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011 Dec;96(12):E2063-71; Tan MH et al. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2011 Jan;88(1):42-56; Nizialek EA et al. Eur. J. Hum. Genet., 2015 Nov;23:1538-43). This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, the in silico prediction for this alteration is inconclusive. Based on the available evidence, the clinical significance of this variant remains unclear. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	curation	Lupski Lab, Baylor-Hopkins CMG, Baylor College of Medicine	Apr 12, 2024	Each variant was annotated with functional scores from MAVE data which was translated into functional evidence codes. All other evidence codes and combining criteria were adhered to as closely as possible based on the ClinGen VCEP (Variant Curation Expert Panel) gene-specific recommendations. See Supplemental Figure 34 of final paper (Supp Fig. 28 in preprint: doi:10.1101/2024.04.11.24305690) for a table to see which lines of evidence we did not have data for. The ClinGen VCEPs are highly regarded as the gold-standard for gene-specific variant curation and are developed after extensive evaluation of the evidence by clinical and scientific experts for the particular gene to classify genomic variants on a spectrum from pathogenic to benign using the 2015 ACMG/AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines as a backbone (PMID: 25741868). Reclassification of these VUS variants from gnomAD or All of Us focused only on variants originally prescribed as VUS in ClinVar. To ensure reproducibility, transparency, and increased throughput, all the procedures for annotating variants and assigning evidence codes were codified using Python. All code has been made freely available and is linked in the Code Availability section and all reclassified variants with evidence codes used can be found in Tables S18-19 (preprint: doi:10.1101/2024.04.11.24305690). For the MAVE data, the clinical curation and clinical strength assignment as per the ClinGen recommendations in Brnich et al. (2020) (PMID: 31892348) for or against pathogenicity or benignity of each of these MAVE datasets utilized in this study were previously published in Fayer et al. (2021) (PMID: 34793697).For PTEN, two assays measuring activity and abundance were used. If the abundance was categorized as "wt-like" or "possibly wt-like," BS3_Supporting evidence was used. Furthermore, if the cumulative score was greater than -5, BS3_moderate evidence was used. This variant GRCh38:10:87965326:A>G was assigned evidence codes ['BS3_Supporting', 'BP4'] and an overall classification of Likely benign -

not specified

Uncertain:2

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp	Oct 30, 2022	Variant summary: PTEN c.1066A>G (p.Asn356Asp) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 4.1e-06 in 245272 control chromosomes (gnomAD). The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.1066A>G has been reported in the literature multiple times from the same group, indicating it occurs in at least one individual affected with Cowden Syndrome (Mester_2011, Tan_2011, Ngeow_2011, Nizialek_2015). These data do not allow any conclusion about variant significance. At least one publication using a yeast assay to evaluate the impact of the variant on lipid phosphatase activity showed the variant had "wild-type like activity" (Michell_2018). Four ClinVar submitters have assessed the variant since 2014: all four classified the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago	Jan 13, 2020	- -

PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome

Uncertain:2

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Jan 17, 2025	This sequence change replaces asparagine, which is neutral and polar, with aspartic acid, which is acidic and polar, at codon 356 of the PTEN protein (p.Asn356Asp). The frequency data for this variant in the population databases is considered unreliable, as metrics indicate poor data quality at this position in the gnomAD database. This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome (PHTS) (PMID: 21194675). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 142263). Invitae Evidence Modeling incorporating data from in vitro experimental studies (internal data) indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt PTEN function with a negative predictive value of 80%. Experimental studies have shown that this missense change does not substantially affect PTEN function (PMID: 29706350, 32350270). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health	Apr 16, 2024	This missense variant replaces asparagine with aspartic acid at codon 356 of the PTEN protein. Functional studies have reported this variant was neutral in lipid phosphatase assays (PMID: 29706350, 32350270). This variant has been reported in an individuals affected with Cowden syndrome in the literature (PMID: 21194675). This variant has been identified in 1/245272 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

not provided

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Jun 13, 2023

In the published literature, this variant has been reported in individuals with PTEN hamartoma syndrome, including Cowden and Cowden-like syndrome (PMIDs: 25669429 (2015), 21343951 (2011), 21194675 (2011), 21956414 (2011)). One experimental study reports the variant has little to no impact on PTEN protein function (PMID: 29706350 (2018)), however further evidence is needed to understand the variant's global impact on proper PTEN function. The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.0000041 (1/245272 chromosomes (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is uninformative in the assessment of its pathogenicity. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded conflicting predictions that this variant is deleterious or benign. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -

Glioma susceptibility 2

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Baylor Genetics

Feb 05, 2024

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.16

BayesDel_addAF

Uncertain

0.11

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.090

CADD

Benign

DANN

Uncertain

0.99

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.60

Eigen

Benign

0.094

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.29

FATHMM_MKL

Pathogenic

0.99

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.97

M_CAP

Uncertain

0.14

MetaRNN

Uncertain

0.70

MetaSVM

Uncertain

0.11

MutationAssessor

Benign

0.69

PrimateAI

Pathogenic

0.80

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.5

REVEL

Uncertain

0.38

Sift

Benign

0.12

Sift4G

Benign

0.52

Polyphen

0.43

Vest4

0.79

MutPred

0.11

Gain of glycosylation at S361 (P = 0.1645);

MVP

0.89

MPC

1.5

ClinPred

0.42

GERP RS

5.3

Varity_R

0.29

gMVP

0.24

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over