10-89003101-T-C

Position:

chr10-89003101-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_000043.6(FAS):c.103T>C(p.Leu35=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00225 in 1,614,104 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 57 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0016 ( 6 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0023 ( 51 hom. )

Consequence

FAS
NM_000043.6 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.42

Variant links:

Genes affected

FAS (HGNC:11920): (Fas cell surface death receptor) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the TNF-receptor superfamily. This receptor contains a death domain. It has been shown to play a central role in the physiological regulation of programmed cell death, and has been implicated in the pathogenesis of various malignancies and diseases of the immune system. The interaction of this receptor with its ligand allows the formation of a death-inducing signaling complex that includes Fas-associated death domain protein (FADD), caspase 8, and caspase 10. The autoproteolytic processing of the caspases in the complex triggers a downstream caspase cascade, and leads to apoptosis. This receptor has been also shown to activate NF-kappaB, MAPK3/ERK1, and MAPK8/JNK, and is found to be involved in transducing the proliferating signals in normal diploid fibroblast and T cells. Several alternatively spliced transcript variants have been described, some of which are candidates for nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD). The isoforms lacking the transmembrane domain may negatively regulate the apoptosis mediated by the full length isoform. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2011]

FAS links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.9).

BP6

Variant 10-89003101-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-89003101-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 301524.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr10-89003101-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-2.42 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00158 (241/152252) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.0235 (113/4802). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.02. There are 6 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 147 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 6 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
FAS	NM_000043.6 linkuse as main transcript	c.103T>C	p.Leu35=	synonymous_variant	2/9	ENST00000652046.1	NP_000034.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
FAS	ENST00000652046.1 linkuse as main transcript	c.103T>C	p.Leu35=	synonymous_variant	2/9		NM_000043.6	ENSP00000498466	A2	P25445-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00159

AC:

242

AN:

152134

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000169

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000262

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00288

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.0165

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.0237

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000250

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00144

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00427

AC:

1073

AN:

251458

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00530

AC XY:

720

AN XY:

135900

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000246

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000116

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00268

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0128

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0245

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000369

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00179

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00232

AC:

3390

AN:

1461852

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00297

AC XY:

2157

AN XY:

727224

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000358

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000179

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00207

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0217

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0240

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000186

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00220

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00158

AC:

241

AN:

152252

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00197

AC XY:

147

AN XY:

74438

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000168

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000262

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00288

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.0166

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.0235

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000250

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00142

Alfa

AF:

0.000501

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00111

Asia WGS

AF:

0.0150

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000709

EpiControl

AF:

0.000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome type 1

Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Jan 29, 2024	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Mar 06, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

not specified

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Jan 09, 2017

- -

not provided

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

not provided

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.90

CADD

Benign

0.10

DANN

Benign

0.21

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over