10-94981301-C-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points: 4P and 1B. PM2PM5BP4
The NM_000771.4(CYP2C9):c.1080C>A(p.Asp360Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000205 in 1,461,664 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Likely benignin UniProt. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. D360N) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000771.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CYP2C9 | NM_000771.4 | c.1080C>A | p.Asp360Glu | missense_variant | 7/9 | ENST00000260682.8 | NP_000762.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CYP2C9 | ENST00000260682.8 | c.1080C>A | p.Asp360Glu | missense_variant | 7/9 | 1 | NM_000771.4 | ENSP00000260682.6 | ||
CYP2C9 | ENST00000643112.1 | n.*89C>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 6/8 | ENSP00000496202.1 | |||||
CYP2C9 | ENST00000643112.1 | n.*89C>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 6/8 | ENSP00000496202.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251170Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000737 AC XY: 1AN XY: 135724
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000205 AC: 3AN: 1461664Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000413 AC XY: 3AN XY: 727140
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at