10-95687353-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_015631.6(TCTN3):​c.630T>C​(p.Ala210Ala) variant causes a splice region, synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00739 in 1,602,830 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 63 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 1/1 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0052 ( 4 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0076 ( 59 hom. )

Consequence

TCTN3
NM_015631.6 splice_region, synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.726

Publications

3 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
TCTN3 (HGNC:24519): (tectonic family member 3) This gene encodes a member of the tectonic gene family which functions in Hedgehog signal transduction and development of the neural tube. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Orofaciodigital Syndrome IV and Joubert Syndrom 18. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding multiple isoforms have been observed for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2012]
TCTN3 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • ciliopathy
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • orofaciodigital syndrome IV
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine
  • Joubert syndrome 18
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • Meckel syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • orofaciodigital syndrome type 6
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.35).
BP6
Variant 10-95687353-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-95687353-A-G is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 130578.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.726 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00524 (799/152360) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00794 (540/68030). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00738. There are 4 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 406 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 4 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TCTN3NM_015631.6 linkc.630T>C p.Ala210Ala splice_region_variant, synonymous_variant Exon 5 of 14 ENST00000371217.10 NP_056446.4 Q6NUS6-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TCTN3ENST00000371217.10 linkc.630T>C p.Ala210Ala splice_region_variant, synonymous_variant Exon 5 of 14 1 NM_015631.6 ENSP00000360261.5 Q6NUS6-1
TCTN3ENST00000265993.13 linkc.684T>C p.Ala228Ala splice_region_variant, synonymous_variant Exon 5 of 14 1 ENSP00000265993.9 A0A0C4DFN5
TCTN3ENST00000430368.6 linkc.500-194T>C intron_variant Intron 3 of 9 2 ENSP00000387567.1 Q6NUS6-5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00525
AC:
799
AN:
152242
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00135
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00334
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000576
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00166
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0126
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00794
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00382
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00530
AC:
1261
AN:
238126
AF XY:
0.00542
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00138
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00158
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000638
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0118
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00780
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00540
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00761
AC:
11038
AN:
1450470
Hom.:
59
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00734
AC XY:
5293
AN XY:
721488
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00104
AC:
34
AN:
32556
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00177
AC:
73
AN:
41328
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000392
AC:
10
AN:
25538
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39646
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00160
AC:
134
AN:
83912
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0126
AC:
672
AN:
53228
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000351
AC:
2
AN:
5696
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00870
AC:
9647
AN:
1108712
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00779
AC:
466
AN:
59854
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.469
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
503
1005
1508
2010
2513
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
368
736
1104
1472
1840
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00524
AC:
799
AN:
152360
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00545
AC XY:
406
AN XY:
74514
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00135
AC:
56
AN:
41588
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00333
AC:
51
AN:
15310
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000576
AC:
2
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5184
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00166
AC:
8
AN:
4828
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0126
AC:
134
AN:
10628
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00794
AC:
540
AN:
68030
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00378
AC:
8
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.497
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
39
78
117
156
195
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00598
Hom.:
3
Bravo
AF:
0.00448
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000866
AC:
3
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
Jan 30, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -

Feb 13, 2015
Genomic Diagnostic Laboratory, Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 05, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:4
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

TCTN3: BP4, BP7, BS2 -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Orofacial-digital syndrome IV;C3553758:Joubert syndrome 18 Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.35
CADD
Benign
10
DANN
Benign
0.79
PhyloP100
0.73
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs41299157; hg19: chr10-97447110; API