11-102331119-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_001165.5(BIRC3):c.1202G>A(p.Arg401Lys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00798 in 1,613,750 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 70 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Likely benignin UniProt.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001165.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIRC3 | NM_001165.5 | c.1202G>A | p.Arg401Lys | missense_variant | 6/9 | ENST00000263464.9 | |
BIRC3 | NM_182962.3 | c.1202G>A | p.Arg401Lys | missense_variant | 7/10 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIRC3 | ENST00000263464.9 | c.1202G>A | p.Arg401Lys | missense_variant | 6/9 | 1 | NM_001165.5 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.00543 AC: 826AN: 152118Hom.: 5 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00588 AC: 1478AN: 251152Hom.: 6 AF XY: 0.00595 AC XY: 808AN XY: 135734
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00825 AC: 12057AN: 1461514Hom.: 65 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00811 AC XY: 5893AN XY: 727066
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.00543 AC: 826AN: 152236Hom.: 5 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00493 AC XY: 367AN XY: 74438
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Dec 01, 2023 | BIRC3: BP4, BS2 - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jul 05, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at