11-102716306-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBS2
The NM_002424.3(MMP8):c.898G>A(p.Asp300Asn) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000233 in 1,564,942 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002424.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMP8 | NM_002424.3 | c.898G>A | p.Asp300Asn | missense_variant | 6/10 | ENST00000236826.8 | NP_002415.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMP8 | ENST00000236826.8 | c.898G>A | p.Asp300Asn | missense_variant | 6/10 | 1 | NM_002424.3 | ENSP00000236826 | P1 | |
MMP8 | ENST00000438475.2 | c.826G>A | p.Asp276Asn | missense_variant | 6/9 | 5 | ENSP00000401004 | |||
MMP8 | ENST00000528662.6 | c.*875G>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 8/12 | 5 | ENSP00000431431 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000194 AC: 29AN: 149504Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000290 AC: 70AN: 241792Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000283 AC XY: 37AN XY: 130602
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000237 AC: 336AN: 1415324Hom.: 3 Cov.: 27 AF XY: 0.000231 AC XY: 163AN XY: 704936
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000187 AC: 28AN: 149618Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000165 AC XY: 12AN XY: 72764
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jun 13, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at