11-108227865-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_000051.4(ATM):​c.162T>C​(p.Tyr54=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00261 in 1,613,016 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0020 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0027 ( 6 hom. )

Consequence

ATM
NM_000051.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:30

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.85
Variant links:
Genes affected
ATM (HGNC:795): (ATM serine/threonine kinase) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the PI3/PI4-kinase family. This protein is an important cell cycle checkpoint kinase that phosphorylates; thus, it functions as a regulator of a wide variety of downstream proteins, including tumor suppressor proteins p53 and BRCA1, checkpoint kinase CHK2, checkpoint proteins RAD17 and RAD9, and DNA repair protein NBS1. This protein and the closely related kinase ATR are thought to be master controllers of cell cycle checkpoint signaling pathways that are required for cell response to DNA damage and for genome stability. Mutations in this gene are associated with ataxia telangiectasia, an autosomal recessive disorder. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2010]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.58).
BP6
Variant 11-108227865-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-108227865-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 132757.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=11, Likely_benign=10, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr11-108227865-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr11-108227865-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.85 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00196 (299/152336) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00348 (237/68020). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00312. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 141 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 6 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
ATMNM_000051.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.162T>C p.Tyr54= synonymous_variant 3/63 ENST00000675843.1 NP_000042.3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ATMENST00000675843.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.162T>C p.Tyr54= synonymous_variant 3/63 NM_000051.4 ENSP00000501606 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00196
AC:
299
AN:
152218
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000506
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000981
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00230
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00124
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000754
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00348
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00191
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00173
AC:
433
AN:
250966
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.00189
AC XY:
256
AN XY:
135674
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000742
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000435
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00228
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000689
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00162
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00278
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00180
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00267
AC:
3903
AN:
1460680
Hom.:
6
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00260
AC XY:
1887
AN XY:
726590
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000449
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000537
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00257
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000686
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00206
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00315
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00189
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00196
AC:
299
AN:
152336
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00189
AC XY:
141
AN XY:
74504
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000505
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000980
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00230
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00124
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000754
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00348
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00189
Alfa
AF:
0.00258
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00172
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000867
AC:
3
AN:
3474
EpiCase
AF:
0.00338
EpiControl
AF:
0.00344

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:30
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:9
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpJan 11, 2016Variant summary: This c.162T>C variant affects a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in synonymous amino acid change. 5/5 splice-site tools via Alamut predict that this variant does not affect normal splicing. This variant was found in 208/121226 control chromosomes (including the large and broad populations of ExAC) at a frequency of 0.0017158, which does not exceed the maximal expected frequency of a pathogenic allele (0.0039528) in this gene. However, the possibility that this variant can still represents as a rare polymorphism cannot be ruled out from the comparison. The variant is more common in European (Non-Finnish) population where its allele frequency is 0.25% (167/66625 chromosomes) including one homozygous occurrence. The homozygote is suggestive of a benign outcome with respect to early onset recessive phenotype A-T. [Penetrance of variants causing A-T is not exactly known.] This variant has been found in patients with A-T, breast and/or ovarian cancer, chronic lymphocytic leukemia and Hodgkins lymphoma. The publications reporting patient occurrences report this variant as polymorphism. In one A-T patient reported, the patient also carried other two potentially pathogenic variants (Buzin_2003), suggesting a benign outcome for this variant. In addition, this variant was found at similar frequencies in a small case-control study (Liberzon_2004), further supporting a benign outcome. Multiple clinical labs have classified this variant as benign/likely benign. Taken together, this variant has been classified as Benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesSep 20, 2022- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsAug 21, 2018- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The ATM p.Tyr54= variant was identified in 8 of 1966 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.004) from Finnish, Dutch and Austrian individuals or families with (BRCA1/2 negative) breast cancer or HBOC, American/non America Indian individuals undergoing radiation therapy, and Jewish children with Hodgkin’s disease (Tommiska_2006_16914028, Thorstenson_2003_12810666, Petereit_2013_24416720, Liberzon_2004_14735203, Broeks_2008_17393301). The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs3218690) “With other allele”, ClinVar (conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity; submitters: benign by Invitae and GeneDx, likely benign by Ambry Genetics and Genetic Services Laboratory (University of Chicago), and uncertain significance by Praxis fur Humangenetik Tuebingen), Clinvitae (4x), and was not identified in GeneInsight-COGR, Cosmic, MutDB, or LOVD 3.0. The variant was also identified in control databases in 486 (1 homozygous) of 276848 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.002 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). Breakdown of the observations by population include African in 14 of 24010 chromosomes (freq: 0.0006), Other in 13 of 6460 chromosomes (freq: 0.002), Latino in 12 of 34408 chromosomes (freq: 0.0003), European Non-Finnish in 359 (1 homozygous) of 126590 chromosomes (freq: 0.003), Ashkenazi Jewish in 24 of 10142 chromosomes (freq: 0.002), European Finnish in 43 of 25762 chromosomes (freq: 0.002), and South Asian in 21 of 30610 chromosomes (freq: 0.0007) while not observed in the East Asian population. The p.Tyr54= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenSep 01, 2024ATM: BP4, BP7 -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoNov 07, 2022- -
not specified Benign:7
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxOct 23, 2013This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Dec 20, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesAug 25, 2017- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoMar 15, 2017- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Ataxia-telangiectasia syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:5
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Apr 11, 2020- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical CenterSep 27, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical CenterJun 28, 2017- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabMay 18, 2021- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthApr 25, 2015- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingTrue Health DiagnosticsJan 03, 2018- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Jul 15, 2020- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJun 20, 2014This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingSpanish ATM Cancer Susceptibility Variant Interpretation Working GroupJun 17, 2020The c.162T>C p.(Tyr54=) variant has an allele frequency of 0.00283 (0.23%, 334/ 118012 alleles) in the Non-Finnish European population of the gnomAD v2.1.1 non-cancer dataset (BS1; http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). It is a silent variant not predicted to lead to a splicing alteration according to SPiCE, and no splicing site is created/activated according to at least 3 splicing predictors of the set SpliceSiteFinderlike – MaxEntScan – NNSplice - GeneSplicer (BP4). The variant is located at a nucleotide that is not highly conserved across species, based on PhyloP (BP7). This silent variant has been identified in two ataxia telangiectasia patients, but in one case there were also detected two (likely) pathogenic variants (PMID: 12552559) and in the other one, there was also detected an homozygous truncating variant (PMID: 28898322). This, together with the high frequency of the variant in the general population suggests that c.162T>C was just a coincident polymorphism and discards the use of PM3 and PS4 criteria. Therefore, this variant meets criteria to be classified as likely benign. Adapted ACMG/AMP rules applied as defined by the Spanish ATM working group: BS1 + BP4 + BP7 (PMID: 33280026). -
Familial cancer of breast Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMyriad Genetics, Inc.Apr 17, 2024This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical CenterJan 01, 2019- -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioFeb 23, 2022- -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingNational Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free StateApr 19, 2022- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.58
CADD
Benign
0.92
DANN
Benign
0.72
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs3218690; hg19: chr11-108098592; COSMIC: COSV104592234; COSMIC: COSV104592234; API