11-108284478-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_000051.4(ATM):c.3993+5G>T variant causes a splice donor 5th base, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000503 in 1,613,672 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000051.4 splice_donor_5th_base, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATM | NM_000051.4 | c.3993+5G>T | splice_donor_5th_base_variant, intron_variant | ENST00000675843.1 | NP_000042.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATM | ENST00000675843.1 | c.3993+5G>T | splice_donor_5th_base_variant, intron_variant | NM_000051.4 | ENSP00000501606 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00261 AC: 397AN: 152122Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000702 AC: 176AN: 250732Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000612 AC XY: 83AN XY: 135562
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000280 AC: 409AN: 1461432Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000232 AC XY: 169AN XY: 727010
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00265 AC: 403AN: 152240Hom.: 3 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00282 AC XY: 210AN XY: 74428
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:6
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 29, 2013 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Oct 23, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jan 30, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | May 02, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Jul 31, 2024 | - - |
not provided Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Aug 10, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Oct 23, 2019 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Nov 01, 2023 | ATM: BP4, BS1 - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Sep 30, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Oct 07, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Sep 05, 2017 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C. | Jan 16, 2018 | - - |
Ataxia-telangiectasia syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Oct 30, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Familial cancer of breast Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | May 21, 2024 | This variant is considered benign. This variant is intronic and is not expected to impact mRNA splicing. This variant is strongly associated with less severe personal and family histories of cancer, typical for individuals without pathogenic variants in this gene [PMID: 25085752]. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Apr 27, 2023 | - - |
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The ATM c.3993+5G>T variant was identified in 3 of 5470 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.001) from individuals or families with breast cancer or lynch syndrome (Tavtigian 2009, Tung 2016, Yurgelun 2015, ). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs3092842) as "With Likely benign allele", and in ClinVar (classified as benign by GeneDx, Ambry Genetics, Invitae, ARUP, Color Genomics, Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago; as likely benign by Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.), and LOVD 3.0 (1x as likely benign). The variant was identified in control databases in 248 of 276424 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.001 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). It was observed in the following populations: African in 233 of 24018 chromosomes (freq: 0.01), Other in 2 of 6448 chromosomes (freq: 0.0003), Latino in 12 of 34394 chromosomes (freq: 0.0004), and European in 1 of 126028 chromosomes (freq: 0.00001); it was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, Finnish, and South Asian populations. The c.3993+5G>T variant is located in the 5' splice region but does not affect the invariant +1 and +2 positions. However, positions +3 to +6 are part of the splicing consensus sequence and variants involving these positions sometimes affect splicing. In addition, 4 of 5 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing. This variant was identified in an individual with HBOC and a co-occurring BRCA2 variant (c.6405_6409del) increasing the likelihood the ATM c.3993+5G>T variant may not have clinical significance. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State | Apr 19, 2022 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at