11-108289753-T-G
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 1P and 9B. PP3BP4_StrongBP6BS2
The NM_000051.4(ATM):c.4388T>G(p.Phe1463Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000897 in 1,613,668 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 11 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0010 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00088 ( 11 hom. )
Consequence
ATM
NM_000051.4 missense
NM_000051.4 missense
Scores
5
11
3
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 7.71
Genes affected
ATM (HGNC:795): (ATM serine/threonine kinase) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the PI3/PI4-kinase family. This protein is an important cell cycle checkpoint kinase that phosphorylates; thus, it functions as a regulator of a wide variety of downstream proteins, including tumor suppressor proteins p53 and BRCA1, checkpoint kinase CHK2, checkpoint proteins RAD17 and RAD9, and DNA repair protein NBS1. This protein and the closely related kinase ATR are thought to be master controllers of cell cycle checkpoint signaling pathways that are required for cell response to DNA damage and for genome stability. Mutations in this gene are associated with ataxia telangiectasia, an autosomal recessive disorder. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2010]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.
PP3
Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect 6: AlphaMissense, BayesDel_noAF, Cadd, phyloP100way_vertebrate, PROVEAN, REVEL [when max_spliceai, FATHMM_MKL, MetaRNN, MutationTaster was below the threshold]
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.012310088).
BP6
Variant 11-108289753-T-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-108289753-T-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 127388.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=8, not_provided=1, Benign=8, Uncertain_significance=3}. Variant chr11-108289753-T-G is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr11-108289753-T-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 11 AD,AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATM | NM_000051.4 | c.4388T>G | p.Phe1463Cys | missense_variant | 29/63 | ENST00000675843.1 | NP_000042.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATM | ENST00000675843.1 | c.4388T>G | p.Phe1463Cys | missense_variant | 29/63 | NM_000051.4 | ENSP00000501606 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00105 AC: 160AN: 152226Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
160
AN:
152226
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00155 AC: 390AN: 251198Hom.: 6 AF XY: 0.00156 AC XY: 212AN XY: 135762
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
390
AN:
251198
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
212
AN XY:
135762
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000881 AC: 1288AN: 1461324Hom.: 11 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000923 AC XY: 671AN XY: 726968
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1288
AN:
1461324
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
671
AN XY:
726968
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00104 AC: 159AN: 152344Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00102 AC XY: 76AN XY: 74494
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
159
AN:
152344
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
76
AN XY:
74494
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
3
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
2
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
14
ExAC
AF:
AC:
164
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:4Benign:18Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | May 30, 2017 | - - |
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Feb 16, 2022 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Jul 31, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 26, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Nov 26, 2019 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jun 19, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C. | Sep 15, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Jun 10, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Dec 04, 2014 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Vantari Genetics | Oct 26, 2015 | - - |
Ataxia-telangiectasia syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:4
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Apr 17, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Feb 22, 2018 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | Jul 02, 2018 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. - |
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Nov 22, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | May 09, 2016 | Variant summary: The ATM c.4388T>G (p.Phe1463Cys) variant involves the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. 4/4 in silico tools predict a damaging outcome for this variant (SNPs&GO not captured due to low reliability index). However, these predictions have not been validated by any in vitro/vivo functional studies. This variant was found in 172/120622 control chromosomes (3 homozygotes) at a frequency of 0.0014259, which is approximately 3 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic ATM variant for breast cancer (0.0005001), suggesting this variant does not cause breast cancer. The variant was found in 149/65460 European non-Finnish chromosomes (0.002276) with 3 homozygotes; while this frequency does not exceed the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic ATM variant for Ataxia-telangiectasia (AT; 0.0039528), AT is a childhood disorder, and thus it would be unlikely for there to be 3 homozygous unaffected individuals in the ExAC database. Furthermore, it has been shown that while heterozygotes are not at increased risk of developing A-T neurologic manifestations, they have a fourfold increased risk of developing breast cancer through mechanisms that are not understood. Thus, if this were a pathogenic AT-causing variant, it would increase the risk of breast cancer. However, population control data strongly indicate that this variant does not cause breast cancer.This variant has been reported in patients with a variety types of cancers such as BrC, HD, HBOC, B-CLL, OvC, Pancreatic Cancer, and hemangioblastomas, however, there was no strong evidence to support the causative correlation of this variant with the diseases. Additionally, the variant was found to co-occur with likely pathogenic variants (BRIP1 c.440dupA and ATM c.1027_1030delGAAA) in internal specimens tested for cancer risk.Two clinical laboratories (via ClinVar) classified this variant as benign, one classified this variant as likely benign, and two labs classified it as VUS, without evidence to independently evaluate. Considering all, the variant was classified as Likely Benign until additional information becomes available. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Aug 01, 2024 | ATM: BS2 - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Aug 30, 2023 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Feb 05, 2015 | - - |
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The ATM p.Phe1463Cys variant was identified in 12 of 4036 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.00297) from individuals or families with breast cancer, ovarian cancer, Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and Lynch syndrome (Liberzon 2004, Maillet 2002, Stafford 2017, Tung 2016, Yorczyk 2015, Yurgelun 2015). The variant was also identified in dbSBP (ID: rs138327406) as “With other allele”, ClinVar 6x with conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity (as uncertain significance by EGL Genetic and Vantari Genetics, as likely benign by GeneDx, and as benign by Invitae and Ambry Genetics), Clinvitae (4x), and Cosmic databases. The variant was not identified in MutDB, LOVD 3.0, and ATM-LOVD databases. The variant was identified in control databases in 405 of 276966 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.001462 in the following populations: Ashkenazi Jewish in 274 (7 homozygous) of 10144 chromosomes (freq. 0.027), Other in 21 of 6456 chromosomes (freq. 0.0033), Latino in 35 of 34392 chromosomes (freq. 0.001), European (Non-Finnish) in 67 of 126564 chromosomes (freq. 0.0005) and African in 8 of 24014 (freq. 0.0003), increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017). The p.Phe1463Cys variant was found to co-occur with p.Pro604Ser in 2 individuals with Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (Liberzon 2004). One study concluded that the p.Phe1463Cys variant is pathogenic in breast cancer because the amino acid substitution is known to be deleterious to ATM function in patients with B cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas, as well as based on conservation data (Maillet 2002). The p.Phe1463 residue is conserved in mammals but not in more distantly related organisms, and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) suggest that the variant may impact the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to assume pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Familial cancer of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | May 17, 2024 | This variant is considered likely benign. This variant is strongly associated with less severe personal and family histories of cancer, typical for individuals without pathogenic variants in this gene [PMID: 25085752]. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
CADD
Pathogenic
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
D;D;T
Eigen
Uncertain
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D;.;D
M_CAP
Uncertain
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
M;M;.
MutationTaster
Benign
D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
D;D;.
REVEL
Pathogenic
Sift
Uncertain
D;D;.
Sift4G
Pathogenic
D;D;D
Polyphen
D;D;.
Vest4
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at