11-1082921-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_ModerateBP6_ModerateBS2
The NM_002457.5(MUC2):c.1301C>G(p.Pro434Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00444 in 1,612,678 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 27 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 5/6 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002457.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_002457.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MUC2 | NM_002457.5 | MANE Select | c.1301C>G | p.Pro434Arg | missense | Exon 10 of 58 | NP_002448.5 | A0A3S8TMF2 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MUC2 | ENST00000675028.1 | c.1301C>G | p.Pro434Arg | missense | Exon 10 of 30 | ENSP00000502432.1 | A0A6Q8PGX3 | ||
| MUC2 | ENST00000361558.7 | TSL:5 | n.1328C>G | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 10 of 49 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00317 AC: 482AN: 152214Hom.: 2 Cov.: 35 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00340 AC: 844AN: 248154 AF XY: 0.00345 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00458 AC: 6686AN: 1460346Hom.: 25 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.00451 AC XY: 3274AN XY: 726426 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00316 AC: 482AN: 152332Hom.: 2 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.00301 AC XY: 224AN XY: 74480 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at