11-108297326-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1

The NM_000051.4(ATM):​c.4949A>G​(p.Asn1650Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00022 in 1,614,076 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. N1650T) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00040 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00020 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

ATM
NM_000051.4 missense

Scores

17

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:20O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.706

Publications

25 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
ATM (HGNC:795): (ATM serine/threonine kinase) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the PI3/PI4-kinase family. This protein is an important cell cycle checkpoint kinase that phosphorylates; thus, it functions as a regulator of a wide variety of downstream proteins, including tumor suppressor proteins p53 and BRCA1, checkpoint kinase CHK2, checkpoint proteins RAD17 and RAD9, and DNA repair protein NBS1. This protein and the closely related kinase ATR are thought to be master controllers of cell cycle checkpoint signaling pathways that are required for cell response to DNA damage and for genome stability. Mutations in this gene are associated with ataxia telangiectasia, an autosomal recessive disorder. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2010]
ATM Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • hereditary breast carcinoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, ClinGen
  • ataxia telangiectasia
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, ClinGen, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Orphanet
  • hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen, Ambry Genetics
  • prostate cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • sarcoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • familial ovarian cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
  • gastric carcinoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.010849476).
BP6
Variant 11-108297326-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-108297326-A-G is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 127395.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0004 (61/152354) while in subpopulation EAS AF = 0.00886 (46/5190). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00683. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 32 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
ATMNM_000051.4 linkc.4949A>G p.Asn1650Ser missense_variant Exon 33 of 63 ENST00000675843.1 NP_000042.3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ATMENST00000675843.1 linkc.4949A>G p.Asn1650Ser missense_variant Exon 33 of 63 NM_000051.4 ENSP00000501606.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000407
AC:
62
AN:
152236
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000338
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00903
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000558
AC:
140
AN:
251036
AF XY:
0.000398
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000185
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000289
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00729
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000327
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000201
AC:
294
AN:
1461722
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.000173
AC XY:
126
AN XY:
727172
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000119
AC:
4
AN:
33476
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000894
AC:
4
AN:
44722
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26130
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00593
AC:
235
AN:
39658
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000116
AC:
1
AN:
86256
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53382
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5766
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00000270
AC:
3
AN:
1111944
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000778
AC:
47
AN:
60388
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.470
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
18
36
54
72
90
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000400
AC:
61
AN:
152354
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000430
AC XY:
32
AN XY:
74498
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000337
AC:
14
AN:
41594
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
15300
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00886
AC:
46
AN:
5190
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4832
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10616
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000147
AC:
1
AN:
68034
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.518
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000328
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.000431
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000227
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.000511
AC:
62
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00202
AC:
7
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:20Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:7
Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Oct 09, 2020
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 24951259, 19781682, 21787400, 17344846, 24728327, 26976419, 26787654, 26689913, 23555315, 21910157, 12969974, 26506520, 22529920, 20232390, 20305132, 28580595)

Feb 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

ATM: BP4

Mar 27, 2020
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

The ATM p.Asn1650Ser variant was identified in 63 of 23302 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.003) from individuals or families with breast or ovarian cancer and was present in 220 of 52,260 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.005) from healthy individuals (Momozawa 2018, Tavtigian 2009, Tung 2016). The variant was identified in dbSNP (rs55870064) as “with uncertain significance, other allele”, ClinVar (classified as benign by Color, Invitae, Ambry Genetics and Eurofins; and as likely benign by GeneDx, Integrated Genetics, Athena Diagnostics and True Health Diagnostics) and LOVD 3.0 (observed 6x). The variant was identified in control databases in 159 of 282,444 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0006 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: East Asian in 148 of 19,934 chromosomes (freq: 0.007, increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant), Other in 3 of 7208 chromosomes (freq: 0.0004), African in 6 of 24,966 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), Latino in 1 of 35,432 chromosomes (freq: 0.00003), and European in 1 of 128,834 chromosomes (freq: 0.000008); it was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish, Finnish or South Asian populations. This variant has been identified by our laboratory in a patient with a co-occurring, pathogenic ATM variant (c.8288del, p.Arg2763Glnfs*43), who was not affected by ataxia telangiectasia, and in another patient with a co-occurring, pathogenic BRCA2 variant (c.4940_4941del, p.Thr1647Serfs*18), decreasing the likelihood that this variant has clinical significance. The p.Asn1650 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence although 2 of 4 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign.

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

not specified Benign:4Other:1
Jul 11, 2024
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Aug 28, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Sep 30, 2021
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: ATM c.4949A>G (p.Asn1650Ser) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0012 in 304304 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0073 within the East Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within East Asian control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 7-fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in ATM causing Breast Cancer phenotype (0.001), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of East Asian origin. c.4949A>G has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with different types of cancer including pediatric Hodgkins disease, breast cancer, gastric cancer, pancreatic cancer, biliary tract carcinoma, colorectal cancer and lung cancer (e.g. Takagi_2004, Tavtigian_2009, Bernstein_2010, Harismendy_2013, Grant_2015, Huang_2015, Lu_2015, Tung_2016, Toh_2018, Xie_2018, Terashima_2019) but it was also reported in a large number of controls (e.g. Shi_2011, Momozawa_2018). These data do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Breast Cancer. Co-occurrences with pathogenic variants have been observed at our laboratory (RAD51D c.904-2A>T; ATM c.5712dupA, p.Ser1905fsX25; Internal testing), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. Experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function indicated that this variant provided insufficient complementation of radiosensitivity in ATM-null cells and that phosphorylation by this variant in ATM-competent cells was inhibited in a dominant-negative manner (Takagi_2004). The authors conclude that the function of this polymorphic variant is defective under heterozygous conditions, however, in our assessment, the in-vivo impact of this finding is not clearly established. Multiple ClinVar submitters (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant with complete consensus as benign/likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign.

Sep 19, 2013
ITMI
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:reference population

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Apr 13, 2015
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Aug 22, 2017
True Health Diagnostics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Mar 22, 2021
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

Nov 19, 2014
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Ataxia-telangiectasia syndrome Benign:2
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign.

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Familial cancer of breast Benign:2
Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

May 21, 2024
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance.

Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Dec 05, 2022
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.048
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.59
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.61
CADD
Benign
9.0
DANN
Benign
0.34
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.048
T;T
Eigen
Benign
-0.77
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.53
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.12
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.82
T;.
MetaRNN
Benign
0.011
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
-1.7
N;N
PhyloP100
0.71
PrimateAI
Benign
0.27
T
PROVEAN
Benign
0.020
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.059
Sift
Benign
1.0
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
1.0
T;T
Vest4
0.14
ClinPred
0.0098
T
GERP RS
1.9
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Varity_R
0.044
gMVP
0.050
Mutation Taster
=85/15
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.14
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs55870064; hg19: chr11-108168053; COSMIC: COSV53758615; API