11-108315904-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_000051.4(ATM):c.6088A>G(p.Ile2030Val) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000911 in 1,611,198 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 21 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. I2030L) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000051.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000051.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATM | MANE Select | c.6088A>G | p.Ile2030Val | missense | Exon 41 of 63 | ENSP00000501606.1 | Q13315 | ||
| ATM | TSL:1 | c.6088A>G | p.Ile2030Val | missense | Exon 42 of 64 | ENSP00000388058.2 | Q13315 | ||
| ATM | TSL:1 | n.*1152A>G | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 39 of 61 | ENSP00000435747.2 | E9PIN0 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00475 AC: 722AN: 152154Hom.: 9 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00126 AC: 318AN: 251420 AF XY: 0.000927 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000511 AC: 745AN: 1458926Hom.: 12 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000415 AC XY: 301AN XY: 725990 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00475 AC: 723AN: 152272Hom.: 9 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00463 AC XY: 345AN XY: 74448 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at