11-108327657-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1
The NM_000051.4(ATM):c.6988C>G(p.Leu2330Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000142 in 1,613,796 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. L2330L) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000051.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATM | NM_000051.4 | c.6988C>G | p.Leu2330Val | missense_variant | 48/63 | ENST00000675843.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATM | ENST00000675843.1 | c.6988C>G | p.Leu2330Val | missense_variant | 48/63 | NM_000051.4 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.000670 AC: 102AN: 152132Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000207 AC: 52AN: 250962Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000155 AC XY: 21AN XY: 135638
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000869 AC: 127AN: 1461544Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0000798 AC XY: 58AN XY: 727090
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.000670 AC: 102AN: 152252Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000779 AC XY: 58AN XY: 74432
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:7
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 07, 2021 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 19781682, 12810666, 25980754, 11505391, 23555315) - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Nov 23, 2018 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jul 20, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Sep 01, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Jul 07, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Dec 08, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Sep 09, 2020 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C. | Jan 18, 2024 | - - |
Ataxia-telangiectasia syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Oct 30, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Sep 25, 2020 | Variant summary: ATM c.6988C>G (p.Leu2330Val) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the PIK-related kinase, FAT domain (IPR003151) of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00021 in 250962 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0026 within the African or African-American subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within African or African-American control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 2.6-fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant (MPAF) in ATM causing Breast Cancer phenotype (0.001), suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of African or African-American origin. In addition, the variant was reported in 17/ 2559 African American women (i.e. with an allele frequency of 0.0033), who were older than age 70, and have never had cancer (in the FLOSSIES database); this allele frequency is 3.3-fold higher than the MPAF (0.001), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. c.6988C>G has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with breast cancer (Teraoka_2001, Tavtigian_2009, Bernstein_2010) and in one individual with Lynch syndrome-associated cancer and/or colorectal polyps (Yurgelun_2015), however without strong evidence for causality. Furthermore, no association with the disease was found for this variant in a large breast cancer case-control study (Haiman_2013). To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Six other submitters have provided clinical-significance assessments for this variant in ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation, and classified the variant as VUS (2x) and likely benign (4x). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | May 26, 2021 | - - |
ATM-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jul 06, 2022 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Hereditary cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | Jan 23, 2024 | - - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State | Apr 19, 2022 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at