11-108330400-T-C
Variant names:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7
The NM_000051.4(ATM):c.7494T>C(p.Ser2498Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000291 in 1,614,064 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000099 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00031 ( 1 hom. )
Consequence
ATM
NM_000051.4 synonymous
NM_000051.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.0480
Genes affected
ATM (HGNC:795): (ATM serine/threonine kinase) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the PI3/PI4-kinase family. This protein is an important cell cycle checkpoint kinase that phosphorylates; thus, it functions as a regulator of a wide variety of downstream proteins, including tumor suppressor proteins p53 and BRCA1, checkpoint kinase CHK2, checkpoint proteins RAD17 and RAD9, and DNA repair protein NBS1. This protein and the closely related kinase ATR are thought to be master controllers of cell cycle checkpoint signaling pathways that are required for cell response to DNA damage and for genome stability. Mutations in this gene are associated with ataxia telangiectasia, an autosomal recessive disorder. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2010]
C11orf65 (HGNC:28519): (chromosome 11 open reading frame 65) Predicted to be involved in negative regulation of mitochondrial fission and negative regulation of protein targeting to mitochondrion. Predicted to be located in cytosol and mitochondrial outer membrane. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.76).
BP6
Variant 11-108330400-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-108330400-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 181839.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=2, Benign=2, Likely_benign=8}.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.048 with no splicing effect.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATM | NM_000051.4 | c.7494T>C | p.Ser2498Ser | synonymous_variant | Exon 50 of 63 | ENST00000675843.1 | NP_000042.3 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000985 AC: 15AN: 152228Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
15
AN:
152228
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000677 AC: 17AN: 251180Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000736 AC XY: 10AN XY: 135784
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
17
AN:
251180
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
10
AN XY:
135784
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000311 AC: 454AN: 1461836Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000296 AC XY: 215AN XY: 727222
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
454
AN:
1461836
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
215
AN XY:
727222
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000985 AC: 15AN: 152228Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000121 AC XY: 9AN XY: 74370
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
15
AN:
152228
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
9
AN XY:
74370
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jun 20, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 16, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Oct 08, 2019 | - - |
Ataxia-telangiectasia syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Apr 18, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Dec 23, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2025 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Jul 24, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Oct 28, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jul 16, 2014 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Jul 10, 2024 | Available data are insufficient to determine the clinical significance of the variant at this time. The frequency of this variant in the general population is uninformative in assessment of its pathogenicity. (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org) Computational tools yielded inconclusive predictions regarding the effect of this variant on RNA splicing. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Mar 19, 2024 | - - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Mar 08, 2023 | - - |
Carcinoma of colon Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The ATM p.Ser2498= variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the LOVD 3.0 database. The variant was identified in dbSNP (rs34393781) as “with uncertain significance allele”, ClinVar (interpreted as "likely benign" by Invitae and 3 others, "uncertain significance" by Integrated Genetics and "benign" by GeneDx). The variant was identified in control databases in 17 of 276,992 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00006 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 2 of 24,032 chromosomes (freq: 0.00008), European in 15 of 126,500 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001), but not in the Other, Latino, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, Finnish and South Asian populations. The p.Ser2498= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. The nucleotide is not highly conserved among mammals and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. - |
ATM-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | May 23, 2019 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Familial cancer of breast Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Jun 14, 2024 | This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at