11-108345882-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. The variant received 6 ACMG points: 6P and 0B. PM1PP3_Strong
The NM_000051.4(ATM):c.8558C>T(p.Thr2853Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000341 in 1,613,562 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. T2853R) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000051.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_pathogenic. The variant received 6 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000051.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATM | MANE Select | c.8558C>T | p.Thr2853Met | missense | Exon 58 of 63 | ENSP00000501606.1 | Q13315 | ||
| ATM | TSL:1 | c.8558C>T | p.Thr2853Met | missense | Exon 59 of 64 | ENSP00000388058.2 | Q13315 | ||
| C11orf65 | TSL:1 | c.*1196+9033G>A | intron | N/A | ENSP00000483537.1 | Q8NCR3-1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000394 AC: 6AN: 152106Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000518 AC: 13AN: 251092 AF XY: 0.0000663 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000335 AC: 49AN: 1461456Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0000413 AC XY: 30AN XY: 727034 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000394 AC: 6AN: 152106Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000404 AC XY: 3AN XY: 74276 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at