11-108347286-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7
The NM_000051.4(ATM):c.8592C>T(p.Tyr2864=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000865 in 1,607,654 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00050 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00090 ( 1 hom. )
Consequence
ATM
NM_000051.4 synonymous
NM_000051.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 1.45
Genes affected
ATM (HGNC:795): (ATM serine/threonine kinase) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the PI3/PI4-kinase family. This protein is an important cell cycle checkpoint kinase that phosphorylates; thus, it functions as a regulator of a wide variety of downstream proteins, including tumor suppressor proteins p53 and BRCA1, checkpoint kinase CHK2, checkpoint proteins RAD17 and RAD9, and DNA repair protein NBS1. This protein and the closely related kinase ATR are thought to be master controllers of cell cycle checkpoint signaling pathways that are required for cell response to DNA damage and for genome stability. Mutations in this gene are associated with ataxia telangiectasia, an autosomal recessive disorder. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2010]
C11orf65 (HGNC:28519): (chromosome 11 open reading frame 65) Predicted to be involved in negative regulation of mitochondrial fission and negative regulation of protein targeting to mitochondrion. Predicted to be located in cytosol and mitochondrial outer membrane. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.52).
BP6
Variant 11-108347286-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-108347286-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 135782.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-108347286-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.45 with no splicing effect.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATM | NM_000051.4 | c.8592C>T | p.Tyr2864= | synonymous_variant | 59/63 | ENST00000675843.1 | NP_000042.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATM | ENST00000675843.1 | c.8592C>T | p.Tyr2864= | synonymous_variant | 59/63 | NM_000051.4 | ENSP00000501606 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000500 AC: 76AN: 152094Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
76
AN:
152094
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000440 AC: 110AN: 249938Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000422 AC XY: 57AN XY: 135164
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
110
AN:
249938
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
57
AN XY:
135164
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000903 AC: 1314AN: 1455442Hom.: 1 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000830 AC XY: 601AN XY: 724490
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1314
AN:
1455442
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
601
AN XY:
724490
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000499 AC: 76AN: 152212Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000457 AC XY: 34AN XY: 74432
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
76
AN:
152212
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
34
AN XY:
74432
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:24
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:10
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Apr 01, 2024 | ATM: BP4, BP7 - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
not specified Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Feb 10, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | May 19, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Jan 27, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | May 13, 2024 | Variant summary: ATM c.8592C>T alters a non-conserved nucleotide resulting in a synonymous change. Consensus agreement among computation tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00086 in 1607654 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0011 within the Non-Finnish European subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 1 homozygote. The observed variant frequency within Non-Finnish European control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 1.1 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in ATM causing Breast Cancer phenotype (0.001), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of Non-Finnish European origin. c.8592C>T has been reported in the literature in individuals with several types of cancers including but not limited to breast cancer and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (Thorstenson_2003, Bernstein_2010, Skowronska_2011, Petereit _2013). These reports however, do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with breast cancer. At least one publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function, however, does not allow convincing conclusions about the variant effect. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 17344846, 12810666, 21933854, 24416720, 20305132). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 135782). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Jun 01, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Jul 16, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jul 14, 2014 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Ataxia-telangiectasia syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Apr 18, 2023 | - - |
ATM-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | May 13, 2024 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The ATM p.Tyr2864= variant was identified in 6 of 5506 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.001) from individuals or families with CLL, breast, or ovarian cancer (Bernstein 2010, Petereit 2013, Skowronska 2012, Thorstenson 2003). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs56025670) as "With Likely benign allele ", ClinVar (classified as benign by GeneDx; as likely benign by Invitae, Ambry Genetics, Color Genomics, and Integrated Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America), and in LOVD 3.0 (1x as likely benign). The variant was not identified in COGR, or Cosmic databases. The variant was identified in control databases in 124 of 275644 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0005 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 5 of 23944 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), Other in 1 of 6422 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), Latino in 5 of 34318 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), European in 113 of 125504 chromosomes (freq: 0.0009), while the variant was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, European Finnish, or South Asian populations. The p.Tyr2864= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Familial cancer of breast Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Jun 20, 2024 | This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at