11-110233337-G-A

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_002906.4(RDX):c.1487C>T(p.Ala496Val) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0023 in 1,614,118 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 13 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0016 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0024 ( 13 hom. )

Consequence

RDX
NM_002906.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.28

Publications

11 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

RDX (HGNC:9944): (radixin) Radixin is a cytoskeletal protein that may be important in linking actin to the plasma membrane. It is highly similar in sequence to both ezrin and moesin. The radixin gene has been localized by fluorescence in situ hybridization to 11q23. A truncated version representing a pseudogene (RDXP2) was assigned to Xp21.3. Another pseudogene that seemed to lack introns (RDXP1) was mapped to 11p by Southern and PCR analyses. Multiple alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, May 2012]

RDX Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 24
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
hearing loss, autosomal recessive
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

RDX links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.009947151).

BP6

Variant 11-110233337-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-110233337-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 44638.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00164 (250/152256) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00279 (190/68038). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00247. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 107 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 13 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
RDX	NM_002906.4 link	c.1487C>T	p.Ala496Val	missense_variant	Exon 13 of 14	ENST00000645495.2	NP_002897.1	P35241-1B0YJ88Q6PKD3

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
RDX	ENST00000645495.2 link	c.1487C>T	p.Ala496Val	missense_variant	Exon 13 of 14		NM_002906.4	ENSP00000496503.2		P35241-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00164

AC:

250

AN:

152138

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000362

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00144

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.000288

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00179

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00279

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00144

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00186

AC:

469

AN:

251482

AF XY:

0.00183

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000308

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000607

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.000198

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00226

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00327

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00326

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00237

AC:

3461

AN:

1461862

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00221

AC XY:

1609

AN XY:

727232

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000299

AC:

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000738

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.000191

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39698

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86256

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00322

AC:

172

AN:

53420

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5764

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00278

AC:

3094

AN:

1111990

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00243

AC:

147

AN:

60394

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.471

Heterozygous variant carriers

200

401

601

802

1002

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

120

240

360

480

600

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00164

AC:

250

AN:

152256

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00144

AC XY:

107

AN XY:

74442

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000361

AC:

AN:

41542

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00144

AC:

AN:

15288

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.000288

AC:

AN:

3468

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5182

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4826

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00179

AC:

AN:

10598

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00279

AC:

190

AN:

68038

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00142

AC:

AN:

2108

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.491

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00195

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00158

TwinsUK

AF:

0.00162

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.00285

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.000227

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00244

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00231

AC:

280

EpiCase

AF:

0.00273

EpiControl

AF:

0.00207

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:7

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:4

Jan 23, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 03, 2019

Athena Diagnostics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 29, 2019

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 27231709) -

Aug 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

RDX: BS2 -

not specified

Benign:2

Jun 06, 2017

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

p.Ala496Val in exon 13 of RDX: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it has been identified in 0.3% (411/126718) of European chromo somes including one homozygote by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD, http: //gnomad.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs74983220). -

Feb 04, 2015

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 24

Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

RDX-related disorder

Benign:1

Oct 26, 2022

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.20

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.25

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.13

CADD

Uncertain

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.33

.;.;.;.;T;.;T

Eigen

Uncertain

0.46

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.53

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.96

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.97

.;.;D;D;.;D;D

M_CAP

Benign

0.068

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0099

T;T;T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Uncertain

-0.018

MutationAssessor

Uncertain

2.0

M;M;M;.;M;.;M

PhyloP100

4.3

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.62

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.15

N;.;N;N;N;N;.

REVEL

Uncertain

0.36

Sift

Benign

0.54

T;.;T;T;T;T;.

Sift4G

Benign

0.53

T;.;T;T;T;T;.

Polyphen

0.76

.;.;.;.;P;.;P

Vest4

0.59

MVP

0.63

MPC

0.33

ClinPred

0.078

GERP RS

6.0

PromoterAI

-0.027

Neutral

(source)

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Varity_R

0.063

gMVP

0.73

Mutation Taster

=66/34

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.030

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over