11-118436670-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_001197104.2(KMT2A):c.158C>T(p.Ala53Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00176 in 1,220,738 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 106 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. A53A) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001197104.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Wiedemann-Steiner syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Orphanet, Illumina, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KMT2A | ENST00000534358.8 | c.158C>T | p.Ala53Val | missense_variant | Exon 1 of 36 | 1 | NM_001197104.2 | ENSP00000436786.2 | ||
| ENSG00000285827 | ENST00000648261.1 | c.-798-32105C>T | intron_variant | Intron 1 of 6 | ENSP00000498126.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00647 AC: 965AN: 149140Hom.: 51 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00256 AC: 17AN: 6630 AF XY: 0.00241 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00111 AC: 1184AN: 1071488Hom.: 52 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.00106 AC XY: 540AN XY: 509898 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00650 AC: 970AN: 149250Hom.: 54 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00697 AC XY: 508AN XY: 72844 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:4
- -
- -
- -
- -
not specified Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at