11-119285483-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_005188.4(CBL):c.1858C>T(p.Leu620Phe) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00178 in 1,614,204 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 70 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. L620V) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005188.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBL | NM_005188.4 | c.1858C>T | p.Leu620Phe | missense_variant | 11/16 | ENST00000264033.6 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBL | ENST00000264033.6 | c.1858C>T | p.Leu620Phe | missense_variant | 11/16 | 1 | NM_005188.4 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00194 AC: 296AN: 152242Hom.: 5 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00301 AC: 756AN: 251406Hom.: 11 AF XY: 0.00282 AC XY: 383AN XY: 135878
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00176 AC: 2573AN: 1461844Hom.: 65 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00175 AC XY: 1276AN XY: 727220
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00194 AC: 296AN: 152360Hom.: 5 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00227 AC XY: 169AN XY: 74506
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:7Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Nov 03, 2014 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | May 26, 2016 | p.Leu620Phe in Exon 11 of CBL: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it has been identified in 3.3% (286/8638) of East Asian chromo somes (including 2 homozygous individuals) by the Exome Aggregation Consortium ( ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs2227988). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 15, 2013 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Oct 29, 2019 | Variant summary: CBL c.1858C>T (p.Leu620Phe) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.003 in 251406 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.033 within the East Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 9 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency within East Asian control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 13200-folds over the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in CBL causing Noonan Syndrome and Related Conditions phenotype (2.5e-06), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of East Asian origin. Three ClinVar submissions (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant twice as benign and once as likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. - |
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Oct 09, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia;C3150803:CBL-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Aug 19, 2021 | - - |
CBL-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 09, 2020 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Noonan syndrome and Noonan-related syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children | Jun 16, 2021 | - - |
RASopathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at