11-119297420-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_005188.4(CBL):ā€‹c.2190G>Cā€‹(p.Thr730Thr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00224 in 1,613,768 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā˜…ā˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.0017 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.0023 ( 8 hom. )

Consequence

CBL
NM_005188.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:16

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.855
Variant links:
Genes affected
CBL (HGNC:1541): (Cbl proto-oncogene) This gene is a proto-oncogene that encodes a RING finger E3 ubiquitin ligase. The encoded protein is one of the enzymes required for targeting substrates for degradation by the proteasome. This protein mediates the transfer of ubiquitin from ubiquitin conjugating enzymes (E2) to specific substrates. This protein also contains an N-terminal phosphotyrosine binding domain that allows it to interact with numerous tyrosine-phosphorylated substrates and target them for proteasome degradation. As such it functions as a negative regulator of many signal transduction pathways. This gene has been found to be mutated or translocated in many cancers including acute myeloid leukaemia, and expansion of CGG repeats in the 5' UTR has been associated with Jacobsen syndrome. Mutations in this gene are also the cause of Noonan syndrome-like disorder. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.74).
BP6
Variant 11-119297420-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-119297420-G-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 136665.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-119297420-G-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00166 (253/152172) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00234 (159/68004). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00204. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 121 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 253 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
CBLNM_005188.4 linkc.2190G>C p.Thr730Thr synonymous_variant 14/16 ENST00000264033.6 NP_005179.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CBLENST00000264033.6 linkc.2190G>C p.Thr730Thr synonymous_variant 14/161 NM_005188.4 ENSP00000264033.3 P22681

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00166
AC:
253
AN:
152054
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000459
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000327
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0150
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000831
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00113
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00234
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000958
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00219
AC:
551
AN:
251342
Hom.:
2
AF XY:
0.00227
AC XY:
309
AN XY:
135838
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000554
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000405
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0150
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000784
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00139
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00273
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00212
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00230
AC:
3356
AN:
1461596
Hom.:
8
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00227
AC XY:
1649
AN XY:
727096
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000299
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000335
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0137
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000765
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00148
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00244
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00192
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00166
AC:
253
AN:
152172
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00163
AC XY:
121
AN XY:
74416
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000458
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000327
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0150
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000832
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00113
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00234
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000948
Alfa
AF:
0.00301
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.00170
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000577
AC:
2
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00229
EpiControl
AF:
0.00196

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:16
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:6
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenOct 01, 2024CBL: BP4, BP7 -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesAug 16, 2023- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxNov 11, 2013This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpMay 16, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMar 19, 2012p.Thr730Thr in Exon 14 of CBL: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located within the splice consensus sequence and has been identified in 0.3% (23/7020) of Euro pean American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs143840974). -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoOct 14, 2016- -
CBL-related disorder Benign:2
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesMay 17, 2019This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMay 17, 2022This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
RASopathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 31, 2024- -
Noonan syndrome and Noonan-related syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick ChildrenFeb 25, 2021- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.74
CADD
Benign
0.28
DANN
Benign
0.55
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs143840974; hg19: chr11-119168130; COSMIC: COSV104382420; COSMIC: COSV104382420; API