11-119298451-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_005188.4(CBL):c.2345C>T(p.Pro782Leu) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00058 in 1,614,116 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0026 ( 3 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00036 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

CBL
NM_005188.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:11O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.04

Variant links:

Genes affected

CBL (HGNC:1541): (Cbl proto-oncogene) This gene is a proto-oncogene that encodes a RING finger E3 ubiquitin ligase. The encoded protein is one of the enzymes required for targeting substrates for degradation by the proteasome. This protein mediates the transfer of ubiquitin from ubiquitin conjugating enzymes (E2) to specific substrates. This protein also contains an N-terminal phosphotyrosine binding domain that allows it to interact with numerous tyrosine-phosphorylated substrates and target them for proteasome degradation. As such it functions as a negative regulator of many signal transduction pathways. This gene has been found to be mutated or translocated in many cancers including acute myeloid leukaemia, and expansion of CGG repeats in the 5' UTR has been associated with Jacobsen syndrome. Mutations in this gene are also the cause of Noonan syndrome-like disorder. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2016]

CBL links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.005753964).

BP6

Variant 11-119298451-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-119298451-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 40421.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Benign=8, Uncertain_significance=1, not_provided=1}. Variant chr11-119298451-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00265 (403/152294) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00801 (333/41564). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0073. There are 3 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 200 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 403 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CBL	NM_005188.4 link	c.2345C>T	p.Pro782Leu	missense_variant	Exon 15 of 16	ENST00000264033.6	NP_005179.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CBL	ENST00000264033.6 link	c.2345C>T	p.Pro782Leu	missense_variant	Exon 15 of 16	1	NM_005188.4	ENSP00000264033.3		P22681

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00265

AC:

404

AN:

152176

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00806

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00334

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00335

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000783

AC:

197

AN:

251460

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000581

AC XY:

AN XY:

135908

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00824

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00124

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.000381

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000327

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000791

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000489

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000365

AC:

533

AN:

1461822

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000330

AC XY:

240

AN XY:

727222

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00756

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00105

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.000504

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000348

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000134

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000960

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00265

AC:

403

AN:

152294

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00269

AC XY:

200

AN XY:

74486

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00801

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00333

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000147

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00332

Alfa

AF:

0.000560

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00294

TwinsUK

AF:

0.000539

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.000259

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00682

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000725

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000866

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000164

EpiControl

AF:

0.000237

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:11Other:1

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Uncertain:1Benign:4

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 05, 2021

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 21, 2013

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant classified as Uncertain Significance - Favor Benign. The Pro782Leu varia nt in CBL has been identified by our laboratory in this patient's son, however i t has not been seen in the literature. This variant has been identified in 0.7% (30/4398) of African American chromosomes from a large population study by the N HLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/; dbSNP rs222907 3). Computational analyses (biochemical amino acid properties, conservation, Ali gnGVGD, PolyPhen2, and SIFT) suggest that the Pro782Leu variant may impact the p rotein, though this information is not predictive enough to determine pathogenic ity. In summary, additional information is needed to fully assess the clinical s ignificance of the Pro782Leu variant. -

Jul 27, 2020

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: CBL c.2345C>T (p.Pro782Leu) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00078 in 251460 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0082 within the African or African-American subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency within African or African-American control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 3280 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in CBL causing Noonan Syndrome And Related Conditions phenotype (2.5e-06), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of African or African-American origin. c.2345C>T has been reported in the literature in at least one individual affected with Noonan Syndrome (Justino_2015). This report does not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Noonan Syndrome And Related Conditions. Three clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as benign/likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:3

Mar 05, 2021

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 27244893, 24896146, 31057598, 32604168) -

May 22, 2020

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

CBL: BS1, BS2 -

CBL-related disorder

Benign:1Other:1

Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto (IPATIMUP)

Significance: not provided

Review Status: no classification provided

Collection Method: literature only

- -

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Nov 20, 2019

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

RASopathy

Benign:1

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Noonan syndrome and Noonan-related syndrome

Benign:1

May 01, 2020

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.10

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.24

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.11

CADD

Uncertain

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.76

D;.;T;.;.

Eigen

Uncertain

0.43

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.46

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.96

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.95

D;D;D;D;D

M_CAP

Benign

0.047

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0058

T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Uncertain

-0.25

MutationAssessor

Benign

2.0

M;.;.;.;.

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.59

PROVEAN

Uncertain

-2.4

N;.;.;.;.

REVEL

Benign

0.27

Sift

Uncertain

0.0010

D;.;.;.;.

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.010

D;D;D;.;T

Polyphen

0.99

D;.;.;.;.

Vest4

0.78

MVP

0.91

MPC

0.21

ClinPred

0.042

GERP RS

5.6

Varity_R

0.25

gMVP

0.51

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over