11-119339433-A-G
Variant names:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points: 2P and 7B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBP7
The NM_001278431.2(C1QTNF5):c.630T>C(p.Gly210Gly) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000684 in 1,461,612 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★).
Frequency
Genomes: not found (cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 6.8e-7 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
C1QTNF5
NM_001278431.2 synonymous
NM_001278431.2 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -3.72
Publications
0 publications found
Genes affected
C1QTNF5 (HGNC:14344): (C1q and TNF related 5) This gene encodes a member of a family of proteins that function as components of basement membranes and may play a role in cell adhesion. Mutations in this gene have been associated with late-onset retinal degeneration. The protein may be encoded by either a bicistronic transcript including sequence from the upstream membrane frizzled-related protein gene (MFRP), or by a monocistronic transcript expressed from an internal promoter. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2013]
MFRP (HGNC:18121): (membrane frizzled-related protein) This gene encodes a member of the frizzled-related protein family. The encoded protein plays an important role in eye development and mutations in this gene have been associated with nanophthalmos, posterior microphthalmia, retinitis pigmentosa, foveoschisis, and optic disc drusen. The protein is encoded by a bicistronic transcript which also encodes C1q and tumor necrosis factor related protein 5 (C1QTNF5). [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2013]
MFRP Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
- isolated microphthalmia 5Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, PanelApp Australia, G2P, Orphanet
- nanophthalmos 2Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, G2P
- nanophthalmiaInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification was made for transcript
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.79).
BP6
Variant 11-119339433-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-119339433-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 2898321.Status of the report is criteria_provided_single_submitter, 1 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-3.72 with no splicing effect.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1QTNF5 | NM_001278431.2 | c.630T>C | p.Gly210Gly | synonymous_variant | Exon 3 of 3 | ENST00000528368.3 | NP_001265360.1 | |
MFRP | NM_031433.4 | c.*1526T>C | 3_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 15 of 15 | ENST00000619721.6 | NP_113621.1 | ||
C1QTNF5 | NM_015645.5 | c.630T>C | p.Gly210Gly | synonymous_variant | Exon 15 of 15 | NP_056460.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1QTNF5 | ENST00000528368.3 | c.630T>C | p.Gly210Gly | synonymous_variant | Exon 3 of 3 | 1 | NM_001278431.2 | ENSP00000431140.1 | ||
C1QTNF5 | ENST00000530681.2 | c.630T>C | p.Gly210Gly | synonymous_variant | Exon 2 of 2 | 1 | ENSP00000456533.2 | |||
MFRP | ENST00000619721.6 | c.*1526T>C | 3_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 15 of 15 | 1 | NM_031433.4 | ENSP00000481824.1 | |||
C1QTNF5 | ENST00000525657.2 | n.520T>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 2 of 2 | 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
32
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000403 AC: 1AN: 248408 AF XY: 0.00 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
248408
AF XY:
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.84e-7 AC: 1AN: 1461612Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 727100 show subpopulations ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
1461612
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
727100
show subpopulations
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
44722
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
26120
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
86248
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
53318
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
5766
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
1111876
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
60382
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD4 Exomes is highly skewed from 0.5 (p-value = 0.000000), which strongly suggests a high chance of mosaicism in these individuals.
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.325
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
0
1
1
2
2
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
32
ClinVar
Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:1
Nov 19, 2022
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
DANN
Benign
PhyloP100
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at
Publications
You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.