11-119344876-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The ENST00000619721.6(MFRP):c.770G>A(p.Arg257His) variant causes a missense, splice region change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00559 in 1,613,140 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 383 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. R257R) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000619721.6 missense, splice_region
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFRP | NM_031433.4 | c.770G>A | p.Arg257His | missense_variant, splice_region_variant | 6/15 | ENST00000619721.6 | NP_113621.1 | |
C1QTNF5 | NM_015645.5 | c.-1867G>A | splice_region_variant, 5_prime_UTR_variant | 6/15 | NP_056460.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFRP | ENST00000619721.6 | c.770G>A | p.Arg257His | missense_variant, splice_region_variant | 6/15 | 1 | NM_031433.4 | ENSP00000481824 | P1 | |
MFRP | ENST00000360167.4 | c.770G>A | p.Arg257His | missense_variant, splice_region_variant | 6/10 | 2 | ENSP00000353291 | |||
MFRP | ENST00000529147.2 | n.733G>A | splice_region_variant, non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 5/6 | 5 | |||||
MFRP | ENST00000634542.1 | downstream_gene_variant | 3 | ENSP00000488979 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0280 AC: 4261AN: 152122Hom.: 196 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00843 AC: 2061AN: 244618Hom.: 77 AF XY: 0.00660 AC XY: 878AN XY: 132966
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00323 AC: 4715AN: 1460900Hom.: 182 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00290 AC XY: 2107AN XY: 726714
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0282 AC: 4295AN: 152240Hom.: 201 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0269 AC XY: 2006AN XY: 74438
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 04, 2021 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 27884173, 18648522, 20981092) - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Feb 23, 2015 | - - |
Retinal degeneration Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
Isolated microphthalmia 5 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Late-onset retinal degeneration Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at