11-121102698-C-A

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS2

The NM_005422.4(TECTA):c.33C>A(p.Val11Val) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000163 in 1,613,604 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00014 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00016 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

TECTA
NM_005422.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.03

Variant links:

Genes affected

TECTA (HGNC:11720): (tectorin alpha) The tectorial membrane is an extracellular matrix of the inner ear that contacts the stereocilia bundles of specialized sensory hair cells. Sound induces movement of these hair cells relative to the tectorial membrane, deflects the stereocilia, and leads to fluctuations in hair-cell membrane potential, transducing sound into electrical signals. Alpha-tectorin is one of the major noncollagenous components of the tectorial membrane. Mutations in the TECTA gene have been shown to be responsible for autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing impairment and a recessive form of sensorineural pre-lingual non-syndromic deafness. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

TECTA links:

TBCEL-TECTA (HGNC:54857): (TBCEL-TECTA readthrough) Predicted to enable alpha-tubulin binding activity. Predicted to be involved in microtubule cytoskeleton organization; post-chaperonin tubulin folding pathway; and tubulin complex assembly. Predicted to be active in cytoplasm. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

TBCEL-TECTA links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.33).

BP6

Variant 11-121102698-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-121102698-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 667166.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=3}. Variant chr11-121102698-C-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.03 with no splicing effect.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TECTA	NM_005422.4 link	c.33C>A	p.Val11Val	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 24	ENST00000392793.6	NP_005413.2	O75443
TBCEL-TECTA	NM_001378761.1 link	c.990C>A	p.Val330Val	synonymous_variant	Exon 8 of 30		NP_001365690.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
TECTA	ENST00000392793.6 link	c.33C>A	p.Val11Val	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 24	5	NM_005422.4	ENSP00000376543.1		O75443
TBCEL-TECTA	ENST00000645041.1 link	c.942C>A	p.Val314Val	synonymous_variant	Exon 7 of 10			ENSP00000496315.1		A0A2R8YFB7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000145

AC:

AN:

152028

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000725

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00115

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000176

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000480

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000199

AC:

AN:

250918

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000184

AC XY:

AN XY:

135602

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0000616

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000202

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.000994

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000247

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000654

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000165

AC:

241

AN:

1461576

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000161

AC XY:

117

AN XY:

727110

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000134

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.000727

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0000187

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000169

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000414

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000145

AC:

AN:

152028

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000135

AC XY:

AN XY:

74262

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000725

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00115

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000176

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000480

Alfa

AF:

0.000268

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000147

EpiCase

AF:

0.000273

EpiControl

AF:

0.000178

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:6

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:4

Jul 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

TECTA: BP4 -

Oct 21, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 30, 2023

GeneDx

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

In silico analysis supports that this variant does not alter splicing; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 21

Uncertain:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 12

Uncertain:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

not specified

Benign:1

Apr 30, 2012

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Val11Val in Exon 01 of TECTA: This variant is not expected to have clinical sign ificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located within the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 3/7020 European Americ an chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (ht tp://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs140393508). -

TECTA-related disorder

Benign:1

May 31, 2019

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.33

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.74

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.060

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over