11-1243512-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_002458.3(MUC5B):c.6632G>C(p.Arg2211Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.462 in 1,433,604 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 176,584 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R2211C) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002458.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.375 AC: 43160AN: 115034Hom.: 9453 Cov.: 20 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.409 AC: 88330AN: 216070 AF XY: 0.405 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.469 AC: 618418AN: 1318450Hom.: 167114 Cov.: 116 AF XY: 0.466 AC XY: 306146AN XY: 656660 show subpopulations ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.375 AC: 43209AN: 115154Hom.: 9470 Cov.: 20 AF XY: 0.383 AC XY: 21317AN XY: 55708 show subpopulations ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
- -
- -
not specified Benign:1
Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at