11-1753527-G-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_001909.5(CTSD):c.1215C>A(p.Gly405Gly) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.017 in 1,612,964 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 292 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.012 ( 27 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.017 ( 265 hom. )
Consequence
CTSD
NM_001909.5 synonymous
NM_001909.5 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 1.22
Genes affected
CTSD (HGNC:2529): (cathepsin D) This gene encodes a member of the A1 family of peptidases. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate multiple protein products. These products include the cathepsin D light and heavy chains, which heterodimerize to form the mature enzyme. This enzyme exhibits pepsin-like activity and plays a role in protein turnover and in the proteolytic activation of hormones and growth factors. Mutations in this gene play a causal role in neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis-10 and may be involved in the pathogenesis of several other diseases, including breast cancer and possibly Alzheimer's disease. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.61).
BP6
Variant 11-1753527-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-1753527-G-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 128872.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-1753527-G-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.22 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0124 (1883/152262) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0202 (1376/67996). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0193. There are 27 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 837 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 27 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTSD | NM_001909.5 | c.1215C>A | p.Gly405Gly | synonymous_variant | 9/9 | ENST00000236671.7 | NP_001900.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTSD | ENST00000236671.7 | c.1215C>A | p.Gly405Gly | synonymous_variant | 9/9 | 1 | NM_001909.5 | ENSP00000236671.2 | ||
ENSG00000250644 | ENST00000636615.1 | c.1071+276C>A | intron_variant | 5 | ENSP00000490014.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0124 AC: 1885AN: 152144Hom.: 27 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
1885
AN:
152144
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0117 AC: 2930AN: 249950Hom.: 32 AF XY: 0.0120 AC XY: 1630AN XY: 135608
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
2930
AN:
249950
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
1630
AN XY:
135608
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0175 AC: 25519AN: 1460702Hom.: 265 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0171 AC XY: 12450AN XY: 726688
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
25519
AN:
1460702
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
12450
AN XY:
726688
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0124 AC: 1883AN: 152262Hom.: 27 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0112 AC XY: 837AN XY: 74454
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
1883
AN:
152262
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
837
AN XY:
74454
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
10
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | - | Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis 10 Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | Jul 09, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | Jul 20, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Apr 25, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | May 15, 2016 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at