11-17553513-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_001292063.2(OTOG):c.534C>T(p.Ser178=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000709 in 1,435,582 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0035 ( 2 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00038 ( 4 hom. )
Consequence
OTOG
NM_001292063.2 synonymous
NM_001292063.2 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -1.52
Genes affected
OTOG (HGNC:8516): (otogelin) The protein encoded by this gene is a component of the acellular membranes of the inner ear. Disruption of the orthologous mouse gene shows that it plays a role in auditory and vestibular functions. It is involved in fibrillar network organization, the anchoring of otoconial membranes and cupulae to the neuroepithelia, and likely in sound stimulation resistance. Mutations in this gene cause autosomal recessive nonsyndromic deafness, type 18B. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, May 2014]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.72).
BP6
Variant 11-17553513-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-17553513-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 504777.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-17553513-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.52 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000376 (482/1283276) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0149 (417/28008). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0137. There are 4 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 207 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OTOG | NM_001292063.2 | c.534C>T | p.Ser178= | synonymous_variant | 6/56 | ENST00000399397.6 | NP_001278992.1 | |
OTOG | NM_001277269.2 | c.570C>T | p.Ser190= | synonymous_variant | 5/55 | NP_001264198.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OTOG | ENST00000399397.6 | c.534C>T | p.Ser178= | synonymous_variant | 6/56 | 5 | NM_001292063.2 | ENSP00000382329 | P2 | |
OTOG | ENST00000399391.7 | c.570C>T | p.Ser190= | synonymous_variant | 5/55 | 5 | ENSP00000382323 | A2 | ||
OTOG | ENST00000498332.5 | n.440C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 5/16 | 5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00346 AC: 526AN: 152188Hom.: 2 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
526
AN:
152188
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00111 AC: 77AN: 69078Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000866 AC XY: 30AN XY: 34634
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
77
AN:
69078
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
30
AN XY:
34634
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000376 AC: 482AN: 1283276Hom.: 4 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000334 AC XY: 207AN XY: 620378
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
482
AN:
1283276
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
207
AN XY:
620378
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00352 AC: 536AN: 152306Hom.: 2 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00329 AC XY: 245AN XY: 74466
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
536
AN:
152306
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
245
AN XY:
74466
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
13
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 14, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 15, 2018 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Nov 24, 2014 | Ser190Ser in exon 5 of OTOG: This variant is not expected to have clinical signi ficance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located withi n the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 2.6% (5/194) of Luhya (Kenyan) chromosomes from a broad population by the 1000 Genomes Project (http: //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/SNP; dbSNP rs61995706). - |
OTOG-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | May 07, 2019 | This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at