11-17606066-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001292063.2(OTOG):​c.4087G>C​(p.Ala1363Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.727 in 1,550,206 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 412,865 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. A1363A) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.79 ( 48159 hom., cov: 35)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.72 ( 364706 hom. )

Consequence

OTOG
NM_001292063.2 missense

Scores

15

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.242

Publications

19 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
OTOG (HGNC:8516): (otogelin) The protein encoded by this gene is a component of the acellular membranes of the inner ear. Disruption of the orthologous mouse gene shows that it plays a role in auditory and vestibular functions. It is involved in fibrillar network organization, the anchoring of otoconial membranes and cupulae to the neuroepithelia, and likely in sound stimulation resistance. Mutations in this gene cause autosomal recessive nonsyndromic deafness, type 18B. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, May 2014]
OTOG Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 18B
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Ambry Genetics
  • nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • hearing loss, autosomal recessive
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=1.67201E-6).
BP6
Variant 11-17606066-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-17606066-G-C is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 226892.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.939 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
OTOGNM_001292063.2 linkc.4087G>C p.Ala1363Pro missense_variant Exon 33 of 56 ENST00000399397.6 NP_001278992.1
OTOGNM_001277269.2 linkc.4123G>C p.Ala1375Pro missense_variant Exon 32 of 55 NP_001264198.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
OTOGENST00000399397.6 linkc.4087G>C p.Ala1363Pro missense_variant Exon 33 of 56 5 NM_001292063.2 ENSP00000382329.2
OTOGENST00000399391.7 linkc.4123G>C p.Ala1375Pro missense_variant Exon 32 of 55 5 ENSP00000382323.2
OTOGENST00000342528.2 linkn.1425G>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 9 of 22 2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.787
AC:
119730
AN:
152112
Hom.:
48097
Cov.:
35
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.947
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.616
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.775
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.848
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.825
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.760
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.697
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.845
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.704
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.796
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.755
AC:
111267
AN:
147448
AF XY:
0.753
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.954
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.768
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.837
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.838
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.699
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.711
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.758
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.720
AC:
1006907
AN:
1397976
Hom.:
364706
Cov.:
74
AF XY:
0.721
AC XY:
497023
AN XY:
689478
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.959
AC:
30290
AN:
31594
American (AMR)
AF:
0.764
AC:
27260
AN:
35686
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.843
AC:
21224
AN:
25168
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.803
AC:
28701
AN:
35732
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.754
AC:
59752
AN:
79218
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.691
AC:
33231
AN:
48080
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.842
AC:
4755
AN:
5648
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.703
AC:
758168
AN:
1078872
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.751
AC:
43526
AN:
57978
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.471
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
18324
36648
54972
73296
91620
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
19464
38928
58392
77856
97320
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.787
AC:
119850
AN:
152230
Hom.:
48159
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
0.787
AC XY:
58561
AN XY:
74424
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.947
AC:
39364
AN:
41572
American (AMR)
AF:
0.775
AC:
11860
AN:
15302
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.848
AC:
2943
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.826
AC:
4265
AN:
5166
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.760
AC:
3668
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.697
AC:
7382
AN:
10596
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.861
AC:
253
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.704
AC:
47877
AN:
67980
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.794
AC:
1677
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1253
2506
3758
5011
6264
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
856
1712
2568
3424
4280
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.711
Hom.:
10187
Bravo
AF:
0.801
TwinsUK
AF:
0.702
AC:
2603
ExAC
AF:
0.716
AC:
14213
Asia WGS
AF:
0.791
AC:
2753
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 23, 2017
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Nov 24, 2014
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Ala1375Pro in exon 32 of OTOG: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it has been identified in 100.0% (194/194) of Luhya (Kenyan) c hromosomes from a broad population by the 1000 Genomes Project (http://www.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/projects/SNP; dbSNP rs7934079).

May 09, 2017
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

not provided Benign:2
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 18B Benign:1
Sep 05, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.045
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.79
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.77
CADD
Benign
5.4
DANN
Benign
0.76
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.040
T;.
Eigen
Benign
-1.3
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.2
LIST_S2
Benign
0.38
T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0000017
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
-1.8
N;.
PhyloP100
0.24
PrimateAI
Benign
0.29
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.10
N;.
Sift
Benign
0.31
T;.
Sift4G
Benign
0.41
T;T
Vest4
0.070
ClinPred
0.0034
T
GERP RS
3.0
Varity_R
0.078
gMVP
0.62
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs7934079; hg19: chr11-17627613; COSMIC: COSV107428857; API