11-17634959-C-G
Variant names:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BP4_Strong
The NM_001292063.2(OTOG):c.7585+11C>G variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000082 ( 0 hom., cov: 28)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00057 ( 0 hom. )
Failed GnomAD Quality Control
Consequence
OTOG
NM_001292063.2 intron
NM_001292063.2 intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Not reported in ClinVar
Conservation
PhyloP100: -1.18
Publications
0 publications found
Genes affected
OTOG (HGNC:8516): (otogelin) The protein encoded by this gene is a component of the acellular membranes of the inner ear. Disruption of the orthologous mouse gene shows that it plays a role in auditory and vestibular functions. It is involved in fibrillar network organization, the anchoring of otoconial membranes and cupulae to the neuroepithelia, and likely in sound stimulation resistance. Mutations in this gene cause autosomal recessive nonsyndromic deafness, type 18B. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, May 2014]
OTOG Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
- autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 18BInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Ambry Genetics
- nonsyndromic genetic hearing lossInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- hearing loss, autosomal recessiveInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification was made for transcript
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.93).
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OTOG | ENST00000399397.6 | c.7585+11C>G | intron_variant | Intron 45 of 55 | 5 | NM_001292063.2 | ENSP00000382329.2 | |||
| OTOG | ENST00000399391.7 | c.7621+11C>G | intron_variant | Intron 44 of 54 | 5 | ENSP00000382323.2 | ||||
| OTOG | ENST00000342528.2 | n.4606-651C>G | intron_variant | Intron 19 of 21 | 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000824 AC: 8AN: 97112Hom.: 0 Cov.: 28 show subpopulations
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
8
AN:
97112
Hom.:
Cov.:
28
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000184 AC: 22AN: 119620 AF XY: 0.000167 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
AC:
22
AN:
119620
AF XY:
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AS_VQSR AF: 0.000573 AC: 220AN: 384236Hom.: 0 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.000508 AC XY: 105AN XY: 206828 show subpopulations ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
GnomAD4 exome
Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AS_VQSR
AF:
AC:
220
AN:
384236
Hom.:
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
AC XY:
105
AN XY:
206828
show subpopulations
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
9
AN:
11486
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
42
AN:
19616
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
4
AN:
10064
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
10514
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
22
AN:
52810
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
3
AN:
24484
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
2176
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
132
AN:
236510
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
8
AN:
16576
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD4 Exomes is highly skewed from 0.5 (p-value = 0), which strongly suggests a high chance of mosaicism in these individuals.
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.249
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
32
64
97
129
161
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Age Distribution
Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AS_VQSR AF: 0.0000824 AC: 8AN: 97140Hom.: 0 Cov.: 28 AF XY: 0.000105 AC XY: 5AN XY: 47416 show subpopulations ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
GnomAD4 genome
Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AS_VQSR
AF:
AC:
8
AN:
97140
Hom.:
Cov.:
28
AF XY:
AC XY:
5
AN XY:
47416
show subpopulations
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
3
AN:
26622
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
9886
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
2510
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
3152
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
2742
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
4764
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
188
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
4
AN:
45378
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
1336
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5. (p-value = 0.00000115187), which strongly suggests a high chance of mosaicism in these individuals.
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.281
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1
3
4
6
7
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Age Distribution
Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
DANN
Benign
PhyloP100
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at
Publications
You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.