Genetic Variant OTOG:p.Leu2549Leu (chr11-17635141-G-C) – ACMG Classification: Likely_benign (-2 pts)

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong

The NM_001292063.2(OTOG):c.7647G>C(p.Leu2549Leu) variant causes a synonymous change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000129 in 1,548,496 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. L2549L) has been classified as Benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 7.2e-7 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

OTOG
NM_001292063.2 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Not reported in ClinVar

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.87

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

OTOG (HGNC:8516): (otogelin) The protein encoded by this gene is a component of the acellular membranes of the inner ear. Disruption of the orthologous mouse gene shows that it plays a role in auditory and vestibular functions. It is involved in fibrillar network organization, the anchoring of otoconial membranes and cupulae to the neuroepithelia, and likely in sound stimulation resistance. Mutations in this gene cause autosomal recessive nonsyndromic deafness, type 18B. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, May 2014]

OTOG Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 18B
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
hearing loss, autosomal recessive
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

OTOG links:

Genome browser will be placed here

new If you want to explore the variant's impact on the transcript NM_001292063.2, check out the Mutation Effect Viewer. This is especially useful for frameshift variants or if you want to visualize the effect of exon loss / intron retention.

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.47).

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001292063.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Sel.	Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
	OTOG	NM_001292063.2	MANE Select	c.7647G>C	p.Leu2549Leu	synonymous	Exon 46 of 56	NP_001278992.1	H9KVB3
	OTOG	NM_001277269.2		c.7683G>C	p.Leu2561Leu	synonymous	Exon 45 of 55	NP_001264198.1	Q6ZRI0-1

Ensembl Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
OTOG	ENST00000399397.6	TSL:5 MANE Select	c.7647G>C	p.Leu2549Leu	synonymous	Exon 46 of 56	ENSP00000382329.2	H9KVB3
OTOG	ENST00000399391.7	TSL:5	c.7683G>C	p.Leu2561Leu	synonymous	Exon 45 of 55	ENSP00000382323.2	Q6ZRI0-1
OTOG	ENST00000342528.2	TSL:2	n.4606-469G>C		intron	N/A

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00000659

AC:

AN:

151796

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000242

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

7.16e-7

AC:

AN:

1396700

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00000145

AC XY:

AN XY:

688856

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

31592

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

35684

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

25160

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

35736

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

79198

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

46934

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5696

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

9.27e-7

AC:

AN:

1078742

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

57958

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.475

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00000659

AC:

AN:

151796

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00

AC XY:

AN XY:

74108

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000242

AC:

AN:

41298

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15258

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3464

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5138

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4798

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10588

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

314

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

67944

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2084

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.425

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00000378

ClinVar

Not reported in ClinVar

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.47

CADD

Benign

4.7

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.58

PhyloP100

3.9

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

MaxEntScan Visualizer can be used to analyze the impact of this mutation on the neighboring sequence.

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Variant Effect in Transcripts

RefSeq Transcripts

Ensembl Transcripts

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over