11-2167008-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_000360.4(TH):​c.720G>A​(p.Lys240Lys) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.285 in 1,585,578 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 69,592 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.23 ( 4911 hom., cov: 34)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.29 ( 64681 hom. )

Consequence

TH
NM_000360.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.75

Publications

27 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
TH (HGNC:11782): (tyrosine hydroxylase) The protein encoded by this gene is involved in the conversion of tyrosine to dopamine. It is the rate-limiting enzyme in the synthesis of catecholamines, hence plays a key role in the physiology of adrenergic neurons. Mutations in this gene have been associated with autosomal recessive Segawa syndrome. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been noted for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
TH Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • TH-deficient dopa-responsive dystonia
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, Orphanet
  • tyrosine hydroxylase deficiency
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Myriad Women’s Health

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.45).
BP6
Variant 11-2167008-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-2167008-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 263258.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.75 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.316 is higher than 0.05.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000360.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
TH
NM_000360.4
MANE Select
c.720G>Ap.Lys240Lys
synonymous
Exon 7 of 13NP_000351.2
TH
NM_199292.3
c.813G>Ap.Lys271Lys
synonymous
Exon 8 of 14NP_954986.2
TH
NM_199293.3
c.801G>Ap.Lys267Lys
synonymous
Exon 8 of 14NP_954987.2

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
TH
ENST00000352909.8
TSL:1 MANE Select
c.720G>Ap.Lys240Lys
synonymous
Exon 7 of 13ENSP00000325951.4
TH
ENST00000381178.5
TSL:1
c.813G>Ap.Lys271Lys
synonymous
Exon 8 of 14ENSP00000370571.1
TH
ENST00000381175.5
TSL:1
c.801G>Ap.Lys267Lys
synonymous
Exon 8 of 14ENSP00000370567.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.235
AC:
35758
AN:
152102
Hom.:
4911
Cov.:
34
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.127
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.438
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.197
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.252
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0428
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.142
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.291
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.108
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.320
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.206
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.229
AC:
46358
AN:
202788
AF XY:
0.229
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.123
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.163
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.253
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0351
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.293
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.310
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.253
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.290
AC:
416356
AN:
1433358
Hom.:
64681
Cov.:
60
AF XY:
0.286
AC XY:
203524
AN XY:
710460
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.118
AC:
3899
AN:
32934
American (AMR)
AF:
0.168
AC:
6907
AN:
41158
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.252
AC:
6433
AN:
25540
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0341
AC:
1305
AN:
38298
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.146
AC:
12013
AN:
82238
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.291
AC:
14573
AN:
50054
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.128
AC:
731
AN:
5722
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.323
AC:
355109
AN:
1098104
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.259
AC:
15386
AN:
59310
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.481
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
18431
36862
55294
73725
92156
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
11320
22640
33960
45280
56600
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.235
AC:
35751
AN:
152220
Hom.:
4911
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.230
AC XY:
17107
AN XY:
74426
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.127
AC:
5280
AN:
41560
American (AMR)
AF:
0.197
AC:
3018
AN:
15302
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.252
AC:
876
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0427
AC:
221
AN:
5176
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.143
AC:
689
AN:
4832
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.291
AC:
3080
AN:
10602
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0918
AC:
27
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.320
AC:
21732
AN:
67962
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.204
AC:
430
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.500
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1395
2790
4185
5580
6975
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
368
736
1104
1472
1840
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.277
Hom.:
10740
Bravo
AF:
0.222
Asia WGS
AF:
0.102
AC:
356
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Autosomal recessive DOPA responsive dystonia Benign:6
Jul 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Sep 21, 2015
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Sep 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Feb 07, 2015
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

not specified Benign:3
Jul 31, 2024
Unidad de Genómica Garrahan, Hospital de Pediatría Garrahan
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as Benign based on local population frequency. This variant was detected in 33% of patients studied in a panel designed for Epileptic and Developmental Encephalopathy, Progressive Myoclonus Epilepsy and Abnormal Movements and Neurodegeneration with brain iron accumulation. Number of patients: 31. Only high quality variants are reported.

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not provided Benign:3
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

Apr 14, 2017
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.45
CADD
Benign
11
DANN
Benign
0.93
PhyloP100
1.8
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.11
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs6357; hg19: chr11-2188238; COSMIC: COSV60767253; COSMIC: COSV60767253; API